Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com
writes:
rant
Well, I really hate having default content around, that I have to
delete all the time and people use in tests that later on break if we
change it. The initial content just won't make sense for many sites
and people waste huge amount of
Ross Patterson wrote:
I think it's important that Plone has at least a welcome page when you
install it. Staring at a blank folder_listing is going to put off new
users. We can probably bet rid of the News and Events collections,
though.
I think I'd be opposed to removing the initial content,
I just realized that I forgot to send the links to two important lists
reflecting what I chose to include in my branches. I'd appreciate it
if you could review these and let me know if you see anything that we
need to talk about more.
Plone changelog from my branch:
Ok, so I promised a draft timeline before our meeting on Tuesday.
Here's what I've got:
- Aug 16 initial implementation
- Aug 30 first review due
- Sept 13 revisions due
- Sept 27 review of revisions / vote
- Oct 4 Alpha 1 release
- Oct 25 Beta 1 Release (or directly after the conference?)
-
