On Nov 22, 2007 9:40 AM, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
KSS is a good example of how things should work: they are always working
on improving KSS and have their own release schedule. The jquery work
Martijn Pieters has done is another good example: he implemented that
completely
that this would be a good candidate for 3.1.
+1 from me.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
On Dec 3, 2007 11:20 AM, Andreas Zeidler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in this particular case i'd suggest
the end of the week if that's okay with everyone?
I won't make that, this week is already too full.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing
On Dec 12, 2007 6:27 PM, Florian Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the other PLIP I want to propose besides #213. Martijn did all the
hard work for it already.
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/212
I'll of course abstain from voting on this one. :-)
--
Martijn Pieters
On Dec 12, 2007 11:02 PM, Tom Lazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for starters, i will associate all plips discussed here with 3.1 (once
the framework team has the proper permissions).
perhaps each member could then add his vote to each plip's progress log?
+1
--
Martijn Pieters
it as a basis for
Plone installs is in my opinion a honking great idea.
+1 from me.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
, no code, but I know how to do it
and hope to get it done for January.
+1
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
On Dec 12, 2007 11:02 PM, Tom Lazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
perhaps each member could then add his vote to each plip's progress log?
How about putting your vote in a comment? That'd lower the chances of
conflicts as well as make it easy to see the votes.
--
Martijn Pieters
On Dec 13, 2007 11:07 PM, Martijn Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007 11:02 PM, Tom Lazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
perhaps each member could then add his vote to each plip's progress log?
How about putting your vote in a comment? That'd lower the chances of
conflicts as well
may break backward compatibility.
I like the additional flexibility of #207 regardless of this issue. We
could do both, provided you give us a PLIP on this before midnight.
;-)
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team
would be whether this ties us into an implementation
that we could want to solve differently in the future, e.g. using named
template adapters. Again, not a criticism, it just needs to be thought
through.
I don't see any reason why the two approaches can't compliment each other.
--
Martijn
implications, for example, where a hoster may not want to
reveal this much info to managers of hosted plone sites. Such issues
would confuse the Unified Installer PLIP.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
On Dec 19, 2007 9:42 PM, Martijn Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you can see from the 3.1 release schedule as set by Wichert, the
framework team has set itself this friday as the deadline for
selecting the PLIPs for 3.1.
Whoops, I meant to include a URL for the schedule:
http
On Dec 16, 2007 3:31 PM, Martijn Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it's too late for 3.1, well, too bad. :(
I am okay with including this one for 3.1; it would be a shame if we
didn't include the work.
I'd like to hear from the other framework team members on this. Do we
consider this PLIP
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
hadn't thought of it, and I'm not sure I'll have time, but I'd be
happy to include it if the team agrees and someone can help me with the
implementation.
Wouldn't that make KSS a requirement for anonymous users?
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team
to an island this weekend, and thanks to a minor
crisis with the landlady, I do not have any network at the moment, nor
any time to do reviewing in next to regular work. I should have had
the house in reasonable order by now, but things went otherwise. :-(
--
Martijn Pieters
I am downloading bundles like crazy over leeched Wifi, while standing
outside in a field.. I'll update bundles with notes as connections
become available ;-)
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http
I will take a look at PLIPs 205 and 218 next, this weekend hopefully.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
I've reviewed Martin's plipathon (184, 200, 203 and 204) as well as
Wichert's Product dependencies PLIP (195) today.
5 down, 5 to go.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman
software project; much better than preventing the
project from progressing.
Stepping down won't help us make the deadline.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo
to Unified Installer
then and do them this weekend if possible.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
be great if you do one more as well (and let us
know which, too).
I have both 205 and 218 on my laptop already, so I'll tackle those next.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman
on, and
agreed with the reviewers remarks. I therefor hereby cast my vote to
echo the last reviewer's vote on each PLIP I didn't review myself.
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo
, tools, etc).
The attribute is optional and should be removed when the initialize
method is empty.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
that I agree with that sentiment, especially in light of
what a great job Wichert has done so far. I'm in favour of not
changing a winning formula. ;-)
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Tom Lazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| from | til
-
tomster | 6th | 12th
witsch | 6th | 12th
wiggy | |
raphael | |
danny | |
martijn | 6th | 12th
--
Martijn Pieters
when necessary on things like PLIPs.
Be that as it may, but didn't you reach us all by sending email to
this list? ;-)
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework
.
In your specific case, that'd be for Plone 3.3. Current Plone trunk
will be version 4.0. I'd keep it on the list and not canvas us
directly though.
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 18:38, Martijn Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am staying at the Carlyle Suites Hotel, 1731 New Hampshire Ave NW,
which makes it Du Pont Circle, I believe.
I completely missed the opportunity to let
Ubiquityhttp://labs.mozilla.com/2008/08/introducing-ubiquity/insert
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 23:59, Maurits van Rees
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The plip is:
#197: Add FeedParser as external requirement instead of shipping with it
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/197
Originally proposed by Christian Scholz in December 2007. Seconded
bij Martijn Pieters
and the conference this year due to personal
circumstances. Hope you guys have a great time!
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
my current responsibilities.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 16:56, Hanno Schlichting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose to accept PLIP 237 - Minor i18n upgrades for Plone
3.3. The full text is at http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/237.
+1 from me
--
Martijn Pieters
several people.
The full PLIP can be found here:
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/228
In view of the recent discussion on consistency in the 3.x series, I
am -1 on this for 3.3.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework
this is an exception. +1 on this proposal.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
of functions.
I've been itching to do this myself already. +1!
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
in a locked state.
I've implemented a non-locking Trough-The-Web locking adapter for
several projects now to circumvent the problem; a rather bigger hammer
than we'd like.
+1 on this proposal.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 20:24, Sidnei da Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to propose PLIP #187 for Plone 3.3.
+1
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo
FeedParser as external requirement instead of shipping with it
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/197
I'll reconfirm my previous +1
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 13:27, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to propose PLIP 243 for Plone 3.3: Replace workflow history
viewlet with content history viewlet.
+1
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework
could review it.
I can't find this on plone.org; is this still a proposal to consider?
Enable automatic plugins for Plone with z3c.autoinclude
I am generally +1
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http
.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
. That's something
for the next round.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
for a future version of Plone:
http://markmail.org/message/el63mapo647dh32a
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:45, Raphael Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 on both of them.
Indeed!
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
them? Not sure what standing we'd expect from the
nominator.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 22:37, Steve McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Martijn Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to see people nominated as well; perhaps candidates need to
have someone second them? Not sure what standing we'd expect from the
nominator
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 00:31, Steve McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got it. How's this?
+1 from me :-)
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
, helping develop
the CMF and Zope 3. I have strong opinions about code quality,
testing, and how to make effective use of the component architecture,
and I am the Plone javascript maintainer.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 18:29, Steve McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks to me like we're getting a pretty good list of nominations.
Shall we close nominations in a week? I can send deadline
announcements to the lists and news.
My nomination is in, so +1 ;-)
--
Martijn Pieters
and errand runners, but without votes.
I'm sure that would be very helpful. However, since I am a nominee I
can't really comment on that since I won't be part of the list. :-)
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
-hacks.org/wiki/DetailedRssFeedPlugin) but dev.plone.org
still runs on 0.10.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
to be useful with non-Archetypes
content as well as AT-based content.
collective.transmogrifier already can load both AT-based content and
non-Archetypes content, but is fully pluggable and only needs
additional components to support more details as well as dumping.
--
Martijn Pieters
this not worth
it?
I thought it was rejected? I might have misremembered. It's trivial enough
that I can make a quicky implementation of it though.
No, it was indeed rejected. Not sure why Andi included it. ;-)
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing
module.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
makes a subtle difference if you the code isn't quite ready yet or if
only the notification mail went missing — somehow :). anyway, i'm +1 on
considering the bundle.
Same sentiment here, +1 from me to include it in the review.
--
Martijn Pieters
.
Otherwise this has my +1.
A next step (not necessarily for this PLIP) would be to move that test
in CMFPlone mentioned in r79241 to be moved to ATContentTypes, or both
test and the re-index to be moved to Archetypes, if it is appropriate
there.
--
Martijn Pieters
did
add one sentence to the README to clarify why IIndexer adapters cannot be used
for workflow variables; it was a question I had while reviewing. No further
comments required. :-)
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team
uncle. Alternatively, just set tractor-autoload-zcml to false, which
you did.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
the test
failures, I'm giving this PLIP a +0.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
locking is disabled altogether for example, by implementing ILockable
as no-op operations.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
so (for #237) and would like to ask you to fill in the remaining slots
today.
I've #232 to myself.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
enhancements
review; I've had a unexpected long day today and am exhausted.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
on implementing the PLIP!
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
for this release
* Better documentation for developers and the PLIP process and how it has
changed
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
). :-)
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
can say I concur. +1 on this proposal.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
this
proposal changed in this regard.
Having read the discussion on the bus, I can say I concur. +1 on this proposal.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
technical,
it's a matter of expectations and perception. The Marketing team may
be able to give you some feedback on the confusion or perception
problems that might result from one choice or another. Give them a
deadline for giving feedback.
+1
--
Martijn Pieters
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 18:16, Martijn Pieters m...@zopatista.com wrote:
1) Should there be a significant new feature release of Plone this
year? What are its most basic goals? Which framework team is in
charge?
[..]
I'd nominate the incumbent 3.x team for this; this team already has
2009/10/28 Alec Mitchell ap...@columbia.edu:
I'm in. Any evening or sometime during Friday open space works for me.
Let's find a restaurant tonight and eat together!
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
2009/10/28 Martijn Pieters m...@zopatista.com:
2009/10/28 Alec Mitchell ap...@columbia.edu:
I'm in. Any evening or sometime during Friday open space works for me.
Let's find a restaurant tonight and eat together!
Let's meet at the lobby right now and head out?
--
Martijn Pieters
Let's find a restaurant tonight and eat together!
Let's meet at the lobby right now and head out?
We'll meet at Soul Cafe at 20:00:
http://www.soulcafe.hu/
and head out from there.
Map reference: http://bit.ly/2RAXdV
--
Martijn Pieters
most of you know who I am and since I hate CV
writing, I'll leave it at that. :-)
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
choose how to set up
their own tests
3) Write a separate PLIP for the inclusion of these two packages into
our KGS (but not for the porting of all existing PTC tests, since
that'd be a pretty big task)
I'd go with option 3, for the same reasons as Hanno's.
--
Martijn Pieters
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 17:59, Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu wrote:
Current reviews:
Craig: 5
Rob: 5
Alec: 3
Elizabeth: 2
Laurence: 0
Matthew: 0
Martijn: 0
Ross: 0
Though shamefully behind, I did complete 1 review (#9473).
--
Martijn Pieters
or next week is fine.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
Calliflower is not accepting my pincode tonight, it looks like only
Yiorgis and Craig managed to get in in the first place.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
framework-t...@lists.plone.org
https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone
reservations about the JavaScript libraries
being used, then that'd be good to know before spending much more time
integrating them.
I didn't have any chance yet to look at those packages, sorry.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
framework-t
82 matches
Mail list logo