On Mar 17, 2006, at 3:18 AM, Rocky Burt wrote:
On Mon, 2006-13-03 at 21:13 +, Martin Aspeli wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:18:20 -, whit
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
just to piggy back a bit on this:
I think one consideration that needs to be made is how much you guys
want to start purs
On Mon, 2006-13-03 at 21:13 +, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:18:20 -, whit
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > just to piggy back a bit on this:
> >
> > I think one consideration that needs to be made is how much you guys
> > want to start pursuing new style development.
If we move to a meld like solution we may well end up having nobody who
wants
to work on presentation logic. I certainly have no interest in using
python
to manipulate an XML tree in order to do the equivalent of a tal:repeat.
Yep. This is basically why I think Meld is a slightly dangerou
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:18:20 -, whit
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
just to piggy back a bit on this:
I think one consideration that needs to be made is how much you guys
want to start pursuing new style development. By the time Plone 3
ships, CMF 2.0 will have full customization of views(th
