[Framework-Team] Re: 3.2 Release Manager

2008-06-25 Thread Martin Aspeli

Wichert Akkerman wrote:

Previously Spanky wrote:
I was following the thread re: Plone 3.2 release, and I volunteered to 
help manage this release.  After getting no replies, I asked in #plone 
and got the response (from limi) that this team choses the release 
manager, and that some kind of track record is expected.  This is 
understandable.


As far as I know I'm still release manager for 3.x. I've been waiting
for the foundation board (in the person of that same limi) to answer
some questions I asked about the release manager stipend. Once those
have been answered I'll start planning a 3.2 release.


I'm really glad Spanky's showing so much enthusiasm and willingness to 
do an important job. That said, I think there is a lot to be said for 
having the same release manager for the whole 3.x cycle, from a 
continuity and stability perspective.


Martin

--
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book


___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team


Re: [Framework-Team] Re: 3.2 Release Manager

2008-06-25 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 As far as I know I'm still release manager for 3.x. I've been waiting
 for the foundation board (in the person of that same limi) to answer
 some questions I asked about the release manager stipend. Once those
 have been answered I'll start planning a 3.2 release.

 I'm really glad Spanky's showing so much enthusiasm and willingness to do an
 important job. That said, I think there is a lot to be said for having the
 same release manager for the whole 3.x cycle, from a continuity and
 stability perspective.

I must say that I agree with that sentiment, especially in light of
what a great job Wichert has done so far. I'm in favour of not
changing a winning formula. ;-)

-- 
Martijn Pieters

___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team


Re: [Framework-Team] Re: 3.2 Release Manager

2008-06-25 Thread Raphael Ritz

Martijn Pieters wrote:

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

As far as I know I'm still release manager for 3.x. I've been waiting
for the foundation board (in the person of that same limi) to answer
some questions I asked about the release manager stipend. Once those
have been answered I'll start planning a 3.2 release.
  

I'm really glad Spanky's showing so much enthusiasm and willingness to do an
important job. That said, I think there is a lot to be said for having the
same release manager for the whole 3.x cycle, from a continuity and
stability perspective.



I must say that I agree with that sentiment, especially in light of
what a great job Wichert has done so far. I'm in favour of not
changing a winning formula. ;-)
  


I'm probably missing something but I was quite surprised
by this discussion coming up now. I would also very much
prefer Wichert to continue for the Plone 3.x line if at all
possible.

Maybe there is a way for Spanky to get on board for
Plone 4 by helping Wichert and thereby being trained
on the job?

@Spanky: please don't get this wrong. I very much
appreciate your willingness to take on such an important
task.

Raphael



___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team


[Framework-Team] Re: 3.2 Release Manager

2008-06-25 Thread Spanky

Martin Aspeli wrote:
That said, I think there is a lot to be said for 
having the same release manager for the whole 3.x cycle, from a 
continuity and stability perspective.


+1


___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team


[Framework-Team] Re: 3.2 Release Manager

2008-06-25 Thread Spanky

Raphael Ritz wrote:

Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Martin Aspeli 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

As far as I know I'm still release manager for 3.x. I've been waiting
for the foundation board (in the person of that same limi) to answer
some questions I asked about the release manager stipend. Once those
have been answered I'll start planning a 3.2 release.


The only reason I said anything was due to this sentence:

We need to agree on actually doing that release and find a release
manager for it.

@Wichert So, no mal-intent :) And I agree that you've done a great job.

I'm really glad Spanky's showing so much enthusiasm and willingness 
to do an
important job. That said, I think there is a lot to be said for 
having the

same release manager for the whole 3.x cycle, from a continuity and
stability perspective.



I must say that I agree with that sentiment, especially in light of
what a great job Wichert has done so far. I'm in favour of not
changing a winning formula. ;-)
  


I'm probably missing something but I was quite surprised
by this discussion coming up now. I would also very much
prefer Wichert to continue for the Plone 3.x line if at all
possible.

Maybe there is a way for Spanky to get on board for
Plone 4 by helping Wichert and thereby being trained
on the job?


I would love to shadow Wichert and help him with anything along the way. 
What I *dont'* want is to slow anybody down.



@Spanky: please don't get this wrong. I very much
appreciate your willingness to take on such an important
task.


None taken, I agree with everyone :)


Raphael


~Spanky standing by...


___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team


[Framework-Team] Re: 3.2 Release Manager

2008-06-24 Thread Martin Aspeli

Helge Tesdal wrote:

On 24. jun. 2008, at 22:45, Spanky wrote:

Before I make my case, the reason I didn't simply say I'll do it! is 
because I'd like to know a little bit more about the job.  This is 
what I was really asking for.  I certainly don't want to volunteer for 
something I cannot do :)  So, I asked what the job entails.  Is it 
very code-centric or more process-oriented?  To me, it seems this job 
is about making sure that the appropriate parties are providing the 
pieces required for the release (cutting releases/making eggs), 
compiling everything, running tests, communicating with everyone on 
this and other teams, tagging releases, managing changelogs, building 
consensus about versions/features/direction, etc.  Basically 
managing the release. Maybe I'm totally off-base.  Either way, I'd 
like to learn.


Saying no to people trying to get new features into bugfix releases, 
even though it's unpopular decisions, and even if it's limi who really 
wants to. ;)


Or optilude. :-)

Other useful things that Wichert has done:

 - setting realistic deadlines
 - harassing people to meet said deadlines
 - reading code in checkins
 - complaining when checkins break our policies
 - updating/soliciting release notes
 - owning the stability of a release by setting appropriate standards 
and performing final testing


Cheers,
Martin

--
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book


___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team


[Framework-Team] Re: 3.2 Release Manager

2008-06-24 Thread Spanky

Martin Aspeli wrote:

Helge Tesdal wrote:

On 24. jun. 2008, at 22:45, Spanky wrote:

Before I make my case, the reason I didn't simply say I'll do it! 
is because I'd like to know a little bit more about the job.  This is 
what I was really asking for.  I certainly don't want to volunteer 
for something I cannot do :)  So, I asked what the job entails.  Is 
it very code-centric or more process-oriented?  To me, it seems this 
job is about making sure that the appropriate parties are providing 
the pieces required for the release (cutting releases/making eggs), 
compiling everything, running tests, communicating with everyone on 
this and other teams, tagging releases, managing changelogs, building 
consensus about versions/features/direction, etc.  Basically 
managing the release. Maybe I'm totally off-base.  Either way, 
I'd like to learn.


Saying no to people trying to get new features into bugfix releases, 
even though it's unpopular decisions, and even if it's limi who really 
wants to. ;)


/me is familiar with saying no ;)


Or optilude. :-)

Other useful things that Wichert has done:

 - setting realistic deadlines
 - harassing people to meet said deadlines
 - reading code in checkins


I would request help with this because I won't always full grasp the 
impact of certain code changes, although I do read collective.cvs and 
plone.cvs to keep up with what's happening.



 - complaining when checkins break our policies
 - updating/soliciting release notes
 - owning the stability of a release by setting appropriate standards 
and performing final testing


All of this sounds in line with my expectations of the job :)


Cheers,
Martin




___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team