On Jan 27, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 1/27/09 1:28 PM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
apart from that i'm wondering what the status is?! it's been two
full weeks since the last post in this thread and 3.2.1 is still
not out. is anything blocking this or why does it take that
On Jan 13, 2009, at 12:01 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Why on earth is Products.NuPlone not in the Plone 3.2 egg?
Is this in purpose or just a gross oversight?
Ok, I've released Products.NuPlone 1.0b3.
you got the release year wrong, but that's just a minor detail...
apart
On 1/27/09 1:28 PM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Jan 13, 2009, at 12:01 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Why on earth is Products.NuPlone not in the Plone 3.2 egg?
Is this in purpose or just a gross oversight?
Ok, I've released Products.NuPlone 1.0b3.
you got the release year
On 13.01.2009, at 00:14, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
The question now is how we deal with the release. We could:
- Add Products.NuPlone as a dependency of the Plone egg. This would
mean 'Plone' always comes with NuPlone, but there's no reason overt
for
the dependency.
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi,
Why on earth is Products.NuPlone not in the Plone 3.2 egg?
Is this in purpose or just a gross oversight?
Ok, I've released Products.NuPlone 1.0b3.
This one should be compatible with 3.2. You can use it straight away by
adding Products.NuPlone to your eggs.
The
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi,
Why on earth is Products.NuPlone not in the Plone 3.2 egg?
Is this in purpose or just a gross oversight?
Ok, I've released Products.NuPlone 1.0b3.
This one should be compatible with 3.2. You can use it straight away by
adding
+1. Plone 3 ships with NuPlone in the same way it does with CMFEditions
or any other package, we shouldn't change this in the 3.x series.
+1 Nothing should break on a 3.x upgrade unless we've thought it
through carefully and intend to break it.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Hanno
On 04.01.2009, at 04:06, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Matthew Wilkes wrote:
On 3 Jan 2009, at 07:55, Graham Perrin wrote:
In partial answer,
http://dev.plone.org/plone/wiki/WheredItGoOnPloneTrunk
http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/8805
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Wichert - I'm assuming you've been away for the weekend, but once you
get this, could you at least grant a few people, including me, PyPI
access to Products.NuPlone? We then also need to make the 3.2.1 release
that includes NuPlone ASAP.
I just spoke to Wichert. He's on
Matthew Wilkes wrote:
On 3 Jan 2009, at 07:55, Graham Perrin wrote:
In partial answer,
http://dev.plone.org/plone/wiki/WheredItGoOnPloneTrunk
http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/8805
http://dev.plone.org/plone/query?component=NuPlone+Themeorder=iddesc=1
This is actually really bad, and I think it should block the 3.2 full
release (i.e. with installers).
+1
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
(ccing wiggy in as a ping as he requested for such issues in #8839)
On 4 Jan 2009, at 03:06, Martin Aspeli wrote:
This is actually really bad, and I think it should block the 3.2 full
release (i.e. with installers).
+1
I think we need to:
1) Get a release of Products.NuPlone that works
On 2009-01-04, Martin Aspeli optil...@gmx.net wrote:
I did try to add Products.NuPlone as an egg manually, but that doesn't
work either, because it has a spurious dependency on Products.CMFPlone.
True, although adding it as a source egg (in a pinch) seems to work.
I think we need to:
1)
On 3 Jan 2009, at 07:55, Graham Perrin wrote:
http://dev.plone.org/plone/query?component=NuPlone+Themeorder=iddesc=1
On 2009-01-04, Martin Aspeli optil...@gmx.net wrote:
I did try to add Products.NuPlone as an egg manually, but that
doesn't work either, because it has a spurious
14 matches
Mail list logo
