[Framework-Team] Re: hard dependency on PIL?

2006-09-14 Thread Raphael Ritz
Hanno Schlichting schrieb: Alec Mitchell wrote: On 9/13/06, Raphael Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that's what I meant by saying earlier that PIL isn't necessarily trivial to install. But anyway, I consider my original question answered: it wasn't introduced on purpose in the first place but

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: hard dependency on PIL?

2006-09-13 Thread Alec Mitchell
On 9/13/06, Raphael Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wichert Akkerman schrieb: Previously Alec Mitchell wrote: It's not possible to start Plone if PIL is not installed currently (due to the member image fix). PIL is included in all the installers AFAIK, and is a package in every distro I've

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: hard dependency on PIL?

2006-09-12 Thread Helge Tesdal
On 3:12 pm 09/12/06 Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think a dependency is probably OK, even though it would annoy me to have to do it for all development instances. The swinger for me is the recent security problems that we've had to use PIL to get around. Is it possible to disable

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: hard dependency on PIL?

2006-09-12 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Alec Mitchell wrote: It's not possible to start Plone if PIL is not installed currently (due to the member image fix). PIL is included in all the installers AFAIK, and is a package in every distro I've known. So installing PIL is generally as easy as installing python (whether you