Re: [Framework-Team] Re: who owns what, according to trac
Martin- Thanks for your comments; I will summarize and repost this to the dev list for further discussion. Maybe I will even move this list to the "Plone Strategic Planning" workspace at openplans so that we can edit it collaboratively without creating chaos. :jon Martin Aspeli wrote: Jon Stahl wrote: Scratching my own itch (thanks to Hanno for suggesting I look at the component owner list in trac), I pulled together this list of current component owners, sorted into owned and unowned. COMPONENTS WITH TRAC OWNERS Archetypes nouri I wonder how effectively Daniel can manage this, given that it's such a big piece of code. It'd be good to make sure we can form out bugs here to others as needed. Catalogwitsch Content Rules optilude Control Panel hannosch Image Blob Support witsch Installer (Mac OS X) smcmahon Installer (Unified)smcmahon Installer (Windows)dreamcatcher Intelligenttextmaurits Internationalization hannosch Javascript mj KSS (Ajax) ree Linkintegrity witsch Lockingjfroche Navigation/Folder listings optilude I really wish I could give this to someone else... I don't "own" this in any meaningful way, and I think I become a bottleneck. NuPlone Theme limi Limi is probably a bottleneck here. Unfortunately, we struggle to find people willing to own template/visual bugs. OpenID support davisagli Portlets optilude Search witsch Spelling Error hannosch Transforms hannosch Versioning alecm Visual Editor (Kupu) duncan WebDAV dreamcatcher This one tends to bottleneck, because not enough people know very much about WebDAV. COMPONENTS WITH NO TRAC OWNERS ATReferenceBrowserWidget Accessibility Calendar and time Content Types This one really should have an owner, since it's so fundamental. Discussions Documentation Infrastructure (kind of a broad area) Right, we should rationalise this away. Login and registration This one badly needs an owner. I think Wichert was looking after it, but realised he couldn't keep up. Mail MimetypesRegistry Permissions RSS RTL Upgrade/Migration Usability (also a pretty broad area) Users/Groups Ditto - I think Wichert gave up on this one. Visual and templates This one is huge, and used to be Limi's. Wiki support (Wicked) Workflow Working copy support (Iterate) MY QUESTIONS: Are there owned components where the owner is not active? Are there unowned components that are actually owned? Which unowned components are the most critical to get owners for? See above. Are there unnamed components that need owners? Are there unnamed components that have owners? Should I take this discussion out to the dev list? ;-) Please! If we can define what a component owner does, we can probably recruit some more. Martin ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
[Framework-Team] Re: who owns what, according to trac
Jon Stahl wrote: Scratching my own itch (thanks to Hanno for suggesting I look at the component owner list in trac), I pulled together this list of current component owners, sorted into owned and unowned. COMPONENTS WITH TRAC OWNERS Archetypes nouri I wonder how effectively Daniel can manage this, given that it's such a big piece of code. It'd be good to make sure we can form out bugs here to others as needed. Catalogwitsch Content Rules optilude Control Panel hannosch Image Blob Support witsch Installer (Mac OS X) smcmahon Installer (Unified)smcmahon Installer (Windows)dreamcatcher Intelligenttextmaurits Internationalization hannosch Javascript mj KSS (Ajax) ree Linkintegrity witsch Lockingjfroche Navigation/Folder listings optilude I really wish I could give this to someone else... I don't "own" this in any meaningful way, and I think I become a bottleneck. NuPlone Theme limi Limi is probably a bottleneck here. Unfortunately, we struggle to find people willing to own template/visual bugs. OpenID support davisagli Portlets optilude Search witsch Spelling Error hannosch Transforms hannosch Versioning alecm Visual Editor (Kupu) duncan WebDAV dreamcatcher This one tends to bottleneck, because not enough people know very much about WebDAV. COMPONENTS WITH NO TRAC OWNERS ATReferenceBrowserWidget Accessibility Calendar and time Content Types This one really should have an owner, since it's so fundamental. Discussions Documentation Infrastructure (kind of a broad area) Right, we should rationalise this away. Login and registration This one badly needs an owner. I think Wichert was looking after it, but realised he couldn't keep up. Mail MimetypesRegistry Permissions RSS RTL Upgrade/Migration Usability (also a pretty broad area) Users/Groups Ditto - I think Wichert gave up on this one. Visual and templates This one is huge, and used to be Limi's. Wiki support (Wicked) Workflow Working copy support (Iterate) MY QUESTIONS: Are there owned components where the owner is not active? Are there unowned components that are actually owned? Which unowned components are the most critical to get owners for? See above. Are there unnamed components that need owners? Are there unnamed components that have owners? Should I take this discussion out to the dev list? ;-) Please! If we can define what a component owner does, we can probably recruit some more. Martin -- Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team