On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 16:50, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
1) Stay with the status quo, and hope that
plone.testing/plone.app.testing become the standard for Plone 5. In
the meantime, people can use it in non-core packages only.
2) Use them as test dependencies, and let people
On 2 August 2010 16:35, Martijn Pieters m...@zopatista.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 16:50, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
1) Stay with the status quo, and hope that
plone.testing/plone.app.testing become the standard for Plone 5. In
the meantime, people can use it in
Hi team,
This weekend, I worked on plone.uuid and plone.app.uuid, part of PLIP
#10778 (which is now mostly implemented, by the way). These are both
quite simple packages. Obviously, both have tests.
When writing them, I wanted to use the new plone.testing /
plone.app.testing packages. However,
Hi.
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
When writing them, I wanted to use the new plone.testing /
plone.app.testing packages.
[...]
So, we can either:
1) Stay with the status quo, and hope that
plone.testing/plone.app.testing become the standard
On 1 August 2010 23:27, Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu wrote:
On Aug 1, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi team,
This weekend, I worked on plone.uuid and plone.app.uuid, part of PLIP
#10778 (which is now mostly implemented, by the way). These are both
quite simple packages. Obviously,
On 8/1/10 12:33 PM, in article
aanlkti=o0orsa=scfq1fzbsetj=wtnc+uk5_+nvex...@mail.gmail.com, Martin
Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 August 2010 23:27, Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu
wrote:
On Aug 1, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi team,
This weekend, I worked on