On 13.05.2009, at 01:23, Steve McMahon wrote:
By my reading, here is the list of those willing to participate in a
Plone 4 framework team:
Raphael R.
Ross P.
Matthew W.
David G.
Calvin H.P.
Alec M.
Erik R,
Laurence R.
[...]
If you'd like your name added, or removed, please put in a message
On May 13, 2009, at 1:23 AM, Steve McMahon wrote:
That's eight names, and an excellent set of skills for a release
that's not likely to emphasize UI work.
great team — congrats! :)
andi
--
zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - i...@zitc.de
friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu wrote:
Folks,
A gentle prod since Steve wants to have something to vote on by Friday
There seems to be general agreement on the hybrid team idea. Can we pare
this down to a list of 7 people?
We currently have responses of:
We currently have responses of:
available: Raphael (3), Ross (4), Matt (4)
unavailable: Andi (3)
I'm available. If a million other people want to do it, I'll be
equally happy to bow out and just write a bunch of PLIPs.
Erik
___
Framework-Team
By my reading, here is the list of those willing to participate in a
Plone 4 framework team:
Raphael R.
Ross P.
Matthew W.
David G.
Calvin H.P.
Alec M.
Erik R,
Laurence R.
That's eight names, and an excellent set of skills for a release
that's not likely to emphasize UI work.
If you'd like your
On May 12, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:
Ideally, a framework team should have an odd number of members in
order to avoid tie votes. However, in watching the last couple of
voting sessions for Plone 3, I noticed that there were not that many
PLIPS on which every person voted. So, I
On May 10, 2009, at 8:25 AM, Eric Steele wrote:
Folks,
A gentle prod since Steve wants to have something to vote on by
Friday
There seems to be general agreement on the hybrid team idea. Can we
pare this down to a list of 7 people?
We currently have responses of:
available: Raphael
Eric Steele wrote:
Folks,
A gentle prod since Steve wants to have something to vote on by
Friday
There seems to be general agreement on the hybrid team idea. Can we
pare this down to a list of 7 people?
We currently have responses of:
available: Raphael (3), Ross (4), Matt (4)
On May 8, 2009, at 8:27 AM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Eric Steele wrote:
Since the new Plone 4 is looking like, essentially, a
transitional release, another possibility would be to pull its
framework team members from each of the currently-existing teams.
I'm with Eric here and offer to
Let me ask what the level of enthusiasm is in the current P3 framework
team. If they'd shift to become the new Plone 2009 team and the
existing p4 team would become the trunk team, that might be good. We
could recruit to add to the new Plone 2009 (old P3) team if some folks
are burned out.
IMHO,
Since the new Plone 4 is looking like, essentially, a transitional
release, another possibility would be to pull its framework team
members from each of the currently-existing teams.
Eric
On May 7, 2009, at 7:58 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:
Let me ask what the level of enthusiasm is in the
11 matches
Mail list logo
