Previously Alexander Limi wrote: > Does anyone have any idea what approach people like Google (Gmail etc) use > for their implementation? It certainly seems like the most sensible > implementation out there wrt. to end-user usability - and I'm pretty sure > it scales too.
Judging from how I've seen google sites behave they use something similar to how OpenID works: have a seperate authentication site which sites a domain-wide cookie which is picked by the all the application-sites. Those can verify the cookie internally and will probably cache the result. > Is the session overhead a Zope-specific problem because of the > implementation there, or is it something with using this approach > inherently? The Zope-specific bit is that the default Zope session setup does not (by design) support Zeo clusters. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. _______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
