it gives me warm fuzzies to see the harmonious accordance of prudence :) -w
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Alexander Limi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 08:47:51 -0700, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Right now, the things that concern me are: >> >> - Adding a new way to add content (the "add sibling" proposal) >> - Moving the contextual "manage portlets" link somewhere else >> - Removing the "display" menu and putting the behaviour on the fieldset >> >> (the last one is doubly bad, because it would require any add-on product >> that used this menu to be updated in a possibly backwards-incompatible way, >> to add a field to replicate this, and we'd need a unique solution for non-AT >> content). > > +1, I don't think any of these should land in 3.x. Especially since a lot of > them should hopefully be moot in the next major release anyway — but in the > meantime, let's not change UI behaviour in a minor release. It's bad form, > and while I'm usually tending towards this, I have changed my approach after > seeing the confusion it can cause. > >> Luckily, there's a "workaround". :) All of these changes could be provided >> with easy-to-install add-on products. These could be tested on real users >> and used by those who want different behaviour. > > This is the way to go if you want your pet UI peeve addressed in the 3.x > series. > > Thanks for raising this, Martin. > > -- > Alexander Limi · http://limi.net > > > _______________________________________________ > Framework-Team mailing list > Framework-Team@lists.plone.org > http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team > -- <=> david "whit" morriss opengeo -- http://opengeo.org "If you don't know where you are, you don't know anything at all" Dr. Edgar Spencer, Ph.D., 1995
_______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team