wow, speaking as a digital artist that is quite an uneducated and illinformed
post I've read arguing the benefits of the digital medium over film.
where exposure and depth of field can be entirely controlled in *POST* with no
loss of quality. Thats just bollocks isn't it ? Or do you really
What's important about the Forbes piece is not the precise details (Kodak Park
may not be shuttered, but it was more or less a ghost town as of 5 or 6 years
ago), but the fact that a major business publication is looking at Kodak's
stock collapse as a sign of 'the end.' Forbes is not going to
I found Aaron's post to be very succinct, and brought up some good
points. And a hearty 'fuck yourself' a fine follow-up to get the rowdy
discussion going.
To me, Aaron's post highlighted the focus on debating image quality in
the capture process of film and video, but seldom to I hear discussion
You have Fuji,for now?
Matt
http://www.youtube.com/user/oscarthepug1234
http://www.youtube.com/user/matthelme007
From: David Tetzlaff djte...@gmail.com
To: Experimental Film Discussion List frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2011 8:45 AM
Hey, could someone from CSIF (Calgary Society of Independent Filmmakers)
email me? I have some questions. I tried to send an email to your programmer
email address, but it bounced. Thanks!
-charles
--
Check my myspace page for my streaming films and info -
www.myspace.com/chadwickfilms
or
While Koda's financial struggles are interesting on many levels, and
certainly having some affect on this group.
Please G-d, No more Film Versus Video (Electronic Capture) because really:
WHY DOES IT MATTER TO ANYONE ELSE IF SOMEONE CHOOSES TO USE FILM OR
OTHER MEDIA TO CREATE THEIR WORK?
Frameworks,
I am trying to find information on how to hand process 16mm bw reversal
film. I have come across directions on many sites, but I have not been able
to find out what chemicals to use and where to buy them. Are there any kits
similar to the Kodak TMAX Direct Positive Slide Kit that are
Hello all I'm teaching Experimental Film at NSCAD and we are
hand-processing in a communal darkroom and there is a concern about
our bleach. Does anyone know what the least toxic recipe for a 3374
Hicon B+W reversal bleach is? One that does not use P. Dichromate or
Permanganate?
Has anyone tried
There is an online publication with a new issue that has many articles
on Brakhage, including a new one of mine. They publish in many
languages, and most of the Brakhage articles are in French. The main
page is http://www.lafuriaumana.it/index.php/home ; the Brakhage
articles can be found
mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6517 (20111004) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
(20111004) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6517 (20111004) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Mike Maryniuk WFG
m...@winnipegfilmgroup.com wrote:
I seen your vimeo page
Pretty bad.
About that Vimeo page...
But that been the problem with most of the Digital artists since the 80s.
They talk the talk but they do not walk the walk. Like those guys I
Hi frameworks
I'm just looking at some footage I have got back from Blue Cine Tech saved as
.avi at 18fps. The Frame Size is 768 x 576, usually SD (PAL) frame size is 720
x 576. I just wondered if there was any reason for this as I thought film was
4:3 just like SD video? Would that mean my
square vs non-square pixel?
On Oct 4, 2011, at 5:44 PM, Kevin Timmins wrote:
Hi frameworks
I'm just looking at some footage I have got back from Blue Cine Tech saved as
.avi at 18fps. The Frame Size is 768 x 576, usually SD (PAL) frame size is
720 x 576. I just wondered if there was any
Can you please elaborate on the significance of this?
From: joeg...@aol.com
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 17:47:06 -0700
To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Super 8 Frame Size question
square vs non-square pixel?
On Oct 4, 2011, at 5:44 PM, Kevin Timmins wrote:Hi frameworks
A graphics software like Photoshop uses square pixels. A video monitor plays
the work using scan lines that illuminate rectangular pixels (4:3 aspect ratio).
The lab sent you the version in square pixels. It should look right on your
computer. To make it look right on a video monitor,
http://reelchicago.com/article/filmcraft-s-closing-astro-midwest-s-sole-lab
Pick up yer elements if you left 'em there!!
Mark Toscano
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
Does anyone know where I can purchase some (and a core or two) in the U.S?
Also, where can I get it processed? My filmmaking experience is pretty much
limited to 16mm, but I've recently inherited some double-8 cameras that's I'd
love to experiment with.
Lisa
Hello
Yale Film and Video should have double 8 in stock- they also process/
yalefilmandvideo.com (I think)
Bill Santen
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Barcy, Lisa lba...@cdm.depaul.edu wrote:
Does anyone know where I can purchase some (and a core or two) in the U.S?
Also, where can I get it
I thought film was 4:3 just like SD video...
Wikipedia is your friend. The page below lists the gate sizes and both the
aspect ratio of the recorded image AND the aspect ratio as projected for more
film gauges than I ever knew existed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_film_formats
The
20 matches
Mail list logo
