Re: [Frameworks] 7302 vs 3302

Kodak has now discontinued 7302 acetate bw print stock at this point, which is unfortunate primarily because we (and probably lots of other people) used it for lightstruck leader too. Mark Toscano On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote: > > So if polyester stocks

Re: [Frameworks] 7302 vs 3302

> So if polyester stocks are stronger, why do Kodak and ORWO make print > stocks with acetate base? 1. It's cheaper. 2. You can cement splice it, so it can be used to make intermediates. 3. It's not as strong. The polyester stock is so strong that if you were to run it in a Mitchell and it

Re: [Frameworks] 7302 vs 3302

The pitch on 7302 and 3302 are both long pitch, which is another reason they can cause real problems in a cine camera. They are both intended for the same printing applications but as I said the estar base will give you a much more rugged print. --scott

Re: [Frameworks] 7302 vs 3302

Note that running estar base film stock could badly damage your camera if there is a jam. I believe the pitch on the estar may be different than the acetate. I have shot acetate high con thru my bolex and once in a while the camera will jam because of the pitch difference. The people I know who

Re: [Frameworks] 7302 vs 3302

There is no difference other than the base, but you have to be pretty adventurous to run polyester film in a camera. The polyester base is WAY more rugged and for release prints you definitely want the polyester material. --scott ___ FrameWorks mailing

[Frameworks] 7302 vs 3302

Hello fellow Frameworkers, Can someone enlighten me as to whether there is a difference between 7302 and 3302 beyond that 3302 is polyester and 7302 is acetate? >From the last catalogue I have that listed them both in 2014: 7302 - Fine Grain Release Positive A film for general, black-and-white