It's weird since, thinking only of the technology, the drive-in is the
one place where digital technology seems a clear win. At the drive-in
your usable brightness range is limited anyway, and your resolution does
not have to be wonderful since everyone is watching through dirty car
windows
This week [September 8 - 16, 2012] in avant garde cinema
To subscribe/unsubscribe to the weekly listing, go to
http://www.hi-beam.net/cgi-bin/mailto.pl?mailto=subscribe
or send an email to weeklylist...@hi-beam.net.
Enter your announcements (calls for entries, new work, screenings,
jobs, items
You're absolutely right but that's not really the issue in this case. Just like
all of the small traditional theaters that are going to be forced out of
business because of the conversion, as we all know it's a question of money.
Cruel economic blackmail by the major studios. More here:
Wow.
Those that can't, steal.
Tim
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 7, 2012, at 1:07 AM, Pip Chodorov framewo...@re-voir.com wrote:
http://fablog.ehrensteinland.com/2012/09/06/ray-carney-stop-thief/
September 2012
To all filmmakers, film critics, film archivists,
film academics,
My thought is why did hollywood do the conversion in the first place? Can
someone answer me that? I like the old movies and such and see no real
cinematic value of some hollywood movies. For example CGI of the new star
wars vs. the old model use of Star Wars that used good film making
techniques.
