Hey Colin, I don’t have any measurement devices and honestly I’ve never kept track of my development times for this stock since I was told about this process-to-completion early on. I’ve mostly processed short strands less than 20’/7m in large paper developing trays as negative under a red safe light and just watched it until it looked ‘done’. I’ve done a lot of contact prints under a photo enlarger, bi-packing and shooting off-the-screen with it, but never as a camera stock. Based on visual inspection I’ve noticed it to be done when it’s done and will reiterate that it’s *probably* more about the exposure and developer than the development time.
If you’re mixing your own D-19 you could try Dektol/D-72, it’s all the same chems at different quantities according to my sources: D-72 Dektol Water at 125F/52C, 750.0 ml Metol, 3.0 g Sodium sulfite, 45.0 g Hydroquinone, 12.0 g Sodium carbonate, monohydrate, 80.0 g Potassium bromide, 2.0 g Water to make 1.0 liter D-19 Metol, 2.0 g Sodium sulfite, 90.0 g Hydroquinone, 8.0 g Sodium carbonate, monohydrate, 52.5 g (45 g anhydrous) Potassium bromide, 5.0 g Water to make 1.0 liter I’m slightly skeptical of the order as I’ve been mixing a lot of D-96 lately and usually mix part of the sodium sulfite in first to prevent oxidization from either the Calgon and/or Metol (not sure, and full disclosure that I also failed chemistry all those years ago). I have some of this stock, a camera and bleach. If I can I’ll test it out soon at let you know! Cheers, Chris > On Apr 25, 2018, at 03:41, Colin Brant <colinsbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank y'all for these responses! > > Seth, that is a great resource to know about, thanks for sending the link! > > Chris, I'm very curious about this idea that 7363 is "process to completion"! > Are you saying that when it is "done" it's done and any extra time in the > developer will not affect density? Just curious because I've heard of that > for Fix but never for developer. The Kodak tech sheet, in regard to developer > time, says "develope to recommended control gamma" which is defined as 2.90 > to 3.20. > > Jason, my next tests are going to be at ASA 25... we'll see what happens : ) > > Thanks again! > Cin cin, > cb > > > >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:55 PM, Jason Halprin <jihalp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Oh, and I seem to recall a friend stating that they rated 7363 as ISO 25, >> and developed in D-19 1:1 for 9 minutes (as neg, spaghetti-bucket) >> >> Jason Halprin >> jihalp...@gmail.com >> jasonhalprin.com >> >>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Jason Halprin <jihalp...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> For what it's worth, I shoot 7363 rated at ISO 6, and develop as neg in >>> Dektol 4:1 for 90 sec (spaghetti-bucket method). >>> >>> -JH >>> >>> Jason Halprin >>> jihalp...@gmail.com >>> jasonhalprin.com >>> >>>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 6:03 AM, Chris G <spy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Generally when I want to get a broader tonal range with 7363 I process it >>>> in a paper developer like Dektol. I used Sprint paper developer sometimes >>>> too. Never tried this with reversal though. The film is process to >>>> completion so you can’t really overdevelop it. For less contrast you could >>>> also try a lower concentration of developer. >>>> >>>> Chris Gorski >>>> >>>>> On Apr 21, 2018, at 01:57, Dominic Angerame <dominic.anger...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I use this stock all the time I have it processed as reversal and rate it >>>>> anywhere between 10 or 12 asa i send processing out to a lab the stock is >>>>> tricky because it has very few greys if you want to sell any let me know >>>>> I still film with it contact me off sight for other tips >>>>> domi...@cinemod.net >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 20, 2018, at 3:52 PM, Isaac Brooks <isaacbrook...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> For the D19 treatment/negative I've rated it at a 25 ASA with consistent >>>>>> results. If you have sealed D19, use it with that film. >>>>>> >>>>>> Isaac >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:30 PM Colin Brant <colinsbr...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Dear Frameworks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am having trouble finding consensus on how to shoot and process >>>>>>> Kodak's now discontinued 7363 hi-con stock. I bought a bunch from the >>>>>>> last run they did (2015 I believe) and am now starting to shoot it. I >>>>>>> know that there have been threads that address this in the past (one >>>>>>> even came up in a google search) and that this issue, or similar ones, >>>>>>> are touched on in books like Kathryn Ramey's textbook -- but even so, >>>>>>> I'm still left wondering how to rate it, and how to leave it in >>>>>>> developer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My desire: shoot 7363 in daylight, develope in Lomo tank without >>>>>>> push/pull in D19 as B&W Neg. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In the first test I did, it was shot at 6ASA and developed for about >>>>>>> 6min and this resulted in a mostly overexposed negative. Also, I'm most >>>>>>> familiar with D19 so am not sure if there might be other equivalent >>>>>>> developers requiring the same timing that could give me an idea of >>>>>>> where to begin. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any insight y'all may have would be greatly appreciated! >>>>>>> cb >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> FrameWorks mailing list >>>>>>> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com >>>>>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> FrameWorks mailing list >>>>>> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com >>>>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FrameWorks mailing list >>>> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com >>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >>>> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FrameWorks mailing list >> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com >> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >> >
_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
