Several years ago I attended a screening of Peter Hutton's work at the
Massachusetts College of Art where Peter was present to answer questions.
Being first trained as a still photographer, I couldn't help but think
about the work of Alfred Steiglitz and his "Equivalents". Unfortunately, at
the time I couldn't muster up the courage to ask him about it. Does anyone
else have a similar reaction to his work?

Bob

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Francisco Torres <fjtorre...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>  ''. .  It's like the
> letters my father writes that I never answer.''
> ???
>
> 2016-12-07 15:24 GMT-04:00 Re X <roeen...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Looking forward to the Hutton retrospective starting tonight in NYC!! It
>> runs through Monday at Anthology.
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Mark Street <mstreet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I can't imagine a screening more 'educational' (and edifying and
>>> inspiring) than a series of Peter Hutton's films.
>>>
>>> Mark Street
>>> www.markstreetfilms.com
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Shumona Goel <shumonag...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As a student of Peter Hutton's, I remember distinctly, the first time I
>>>> saw Peter's films projected on film. The auditorium was full and remained
>>>> in pindrop silence through the evening length screening.
>>>>
>>>> One the many things that has stayed with me since that screening, was
>>>> how he had shot a lamp post lit up at night. It was a long take, nothing
>>>> moved. I think there was some snow in the frame. He shot at 8 frames per
>>>> second and over time, you could see the movement of the light from the lamp
>>>> post.
>>>>
>>>> Amazing.
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 4, 2016 10:11 PM, "Tim Halloran" <televis...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "...an act of love..." Nicely stated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tim
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>
>>>>> > On Dec 3, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Chuck Kleinhans <
>>>>> chuck...@northwestern.edu> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 1.  Hutton was an educator.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 2.  For most people, appreciation of “pure” art, of “extremely
>>>>> disciplined style” is learned, not an inherent given of personality,
>>>>> biology, or whatever.  Taste is a social construction,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 3.  Educating potential viewers so they can have such art
>>>>> experiences is (at least in part) an act of love, a social act that makes
>>>>> this a better world.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Chuck Kleinhans
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> On Dec 3, 2016, at 11:03 AM, Bernard Roddy <tactilecor...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Frameworkers!  I don't know who you are, but . . .  It's like the
>>>>> >> letters my father writes that I never answer.  They just keep
>>>>> coming,
>>>>> >> even as I throw them directly in the trash.  What, then, is it to
>>>>> >> write someone, anyway?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> But Peter Hutton work screened at Nightingale.  And I wonder, well:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> What does this have to do with higher education?  That wasn't the
>>>>> >> first thing, though.  It was, is this still acceptable?  It was
>>>>> funny,
>>>>> >> after the show - all totally silent - I had to think of André
>>>>> Kertész
>>>>> >> photographs.  Is this even experimental?  The girl in the seat in
>>>>> >> front of me rested her head on her boyfriend's shoulder.  It was an
>>>>> >> experience resembling a service of some kind.  The show was very
>>>>> well
>>>>> >> attended.  I'm not just saying that.  And understandably so, because
>>>>> >> the experience is hard to get!  It's in film, for god's sake, and it
>>>>> >> couldn't possibly be otherwise - it's pure, it's committed to this
>>>>> >> extremely disciplined style.  You could think, you could wait, and
>>>>> >> there was never anything to distract you . .  (I'm thinking of the
>>>>> >> river film and the Polish city film) . .  But then there's that what
>>>>> >> does this have to do with higher education?  Can this really be part
>>>>> >> of a course of study?  That's where I lose it.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Bernie
>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>> >> FrameWorks mailing list
>>>>> >> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
>>>>> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mailman
>>>>> -2Dmail5.webfaction.com_listinfo_frameworks&d=CwIGaQ&c=yHlS0
>>>>> 4HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=y2hybOip15_0MHKsie4
>>>>> eMM743nBh00sLtx4-ahFzSmg&m=JiLBS3AAMadfkJglpuKieU8d8imUaVDM2
>>>>> 1OEuoFovHA&s=rRyEkT_skAxGeL7iDIvr6Kv8yfS9v9XNUz2FXLcek3k&e=
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > FrameWorks mailing list
>>>>> > FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
>>>>> > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> FrameWorks mailing list
>>>>> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
>>>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> FrameWorks mailing list
>>>> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
>>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FrameWorks mailing list
>>> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> .......
>>
>> "Impotent beauty hates understanding...but beauty cannot act."
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FrameWorks mailing list
>> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Reply via email to