thanks folks!
moiratierney.net
vimeo.com/moiratierney
________________________________
From: Serge Levchin <lestimi...@gmail.com>
To: ev petrol <epetr...@yahoo.com>; Experimental Film Discussion List
<frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com>
Sent: Monday, July 9, 2012 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] 16mm reversal lab(s)?
surely old pac lab is still processing old tri-x?
as for the difference in the ASA ratng: that would be because B&W film is more
sensitive to the blue part of the spectrum; expose it under tungsten light, and
you've effectively reduced the sensitivity of your film, all other things being
equal; to compensate for this you're asked to rate your film at 160 instead of
200, which would then compel you to open up your aperture about 1/3 of a stop.
regards
s
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:04 PM, ev petrol <epetr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
hey folks!
>
>
>where are you using for your 16mm reversal these days?
>
>got the address for yale from colorlab; kodak suggested somewhere in
>plattsburgh (?)
>
>
>exposed some tri-x at 200ASA (instead of the recommended 160ASA) under a
>halogen tungsten light ... thinking it'll probably be ok (?)
>why the difference in recommended exposures btw, anyone have an idea? (since
>there's no added filter suggested for tungsten ... I think?)
>
>
>cheers Moira
>
>
>moiratierney.net
>vimeo.com/moiratierney
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>FrameWorks mailing list
>FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
>https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
