Time. 4/3/1964, Vol. 83 Issue 14, p98. 3p.
No one has heard much about movies like Breath-Death, Cosmic Ray, and
Stone Sonata, but now the Ford Foundation has begun pouring tuns of
gold on the happy heads of the people who made them. The foundation
has decided to encourage the art of film as
!
Nicky.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Kreines j...@kinetta.com
To: Frameworks Discussion List frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Sent: Sat, 31 May 2014 0:08
Subject: [Frameworks] CBS goes Underground
Thanks to Saul Levine for finding this.
Wow! Brakhage, Mekas, Warhol, Sedgwick
Thanks for posting this. A DVD of this was recently issued by Boo-Hooray as
part of their Piero Heliczer-themed Dead Language Press bibliography.
What's interesting for Velvets fans is that this appears to show Angus
MacLise and Maureen Tucker playing with the Velvets at the same time. Does
anyone
On May 31, 2014, at 4:12 AM,
nicky.ham...@talktalk.netmailto:nicky.ham...@talktalk.net wrote:
Was it filmed in a lawyer's office? Willard van Dyke badly lets the side down
by suggesting that 'there is the possibility that new techniques are being
explored and that other filmmakers can benefit
I agree with Chuck's comments. Given how bad mainstream media can be,
this report is really quite good, considering that it was meant for an
evening-news mass audience. Of course nothing profound is said, and
Warhol could easily seem like a fool to those who don't take seriously
John Cage's I
After reading Fred's post I ran (well, typed) straight to the online database
Academic Search Complete to read the Time article. Here it is, for anyone
interested. It is indeed bad (my favorite description is of Brakhage as a
husky hypochondriac), but it's about what you'd expect from a
On May 31, 2014, at 9:35 AM, Andy Ditzler a...@andyditzler.com wrote:
A DVD of this was recently issued by Boo-Hooray as part of their Piero
Heliczer-themed Dead Language Press bibliography.
Was there no music in the Velvets sequence because of music rights, or did the
report air that way?
Jonathan, thanks a lot for posting this, but the article I remember was
earlier, and even worse. It described the films of filmmakers who had
just gotten a Ford Foundation grant in outrageous, and outraged, terms.
I couldn't find it on Time's own site, though I didn't try that hard.
Maybe I
Yeah, the article Jonathan posted (thanks, J.!) was nowhere near as bad as the
one Fred described. You could even defend it's rhetoric on the same grounds
Chuck brought up in terms of the CBS piece. This article follows the classic
form of a persuasive speech to a hostile audience I used to
You weren't dreaming Fred, I found the article. I can't read it or copy it here
though because I don't have the required subscription to Time. Maybe someone
else on the list can help share? My curiosity has been activated.
http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,939493,00.html
Just a note:
While we might feel dismay or anger at the backward attitudes expressed back in
the day, we should also remember that for some people the mere fact of
denouncing experimental films for having sex, homosex, or whatever was a notice
that such things existed and that you might want
Completely agree!
Sent from my iPhone
On May 31, 2014, at 7:28 PM, Chuck Kleinhans chuck...@northwestern.edu
wrote:
Just a note:
While we might feel dismay or anger at the backward attitudes expressed back
in the day, we should also remember that for some people the mere fact of
12 matches
Mail list logo
