Re: [Frameworks] Forbes editorial about Kodak

2011-10-09 Thread Alistair Stray
> From: Aaron F. Ross > Definitely good points. However, don't forget that any film stock can > now be emulated, given good enough digital source material.   No it cannot, not remotely. I work in post, and have done for some time, with both film and digital source and this is not true. The medi

Re: [Frameworks] Forbes editorial about Kodak

2011-10-09 Thread Alistair Stray
'Indistinguishable' is a very subjective call so maybe you're right there to most peoples eyes. But unless its escaped your notice this is an experimental film discussion list, and HDR is not something that even experimental digital filmmakers will have access to for more than a few years for th

Re: [Frameworks] Forbes editorial about Kodak

2011-10-09 Thread Pip Chodorov
This also is a fallacy. Film is a choice more than ever today. 20 years ago it was an obvious choice but today it is a choice with a committment attached - an esthetic, political, poetic or personal committment. More and more young students are getting interested in working with super-8 for e

[Frameworks] 16mm film processing machine USA

2011-10-09 Thread Freya
Weird microfilm film procesing machine on e-bay for $120! I'm sure this could be used to process 16mm film of the normal kind with very little modification. Could also be great for an experimental film project as it contains a camera that can photograph documents too! http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/M