Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2016-12-09 Thread Fred Camper
Pretty much the "textbook definition of bigorty," to paraphrase a certain prominent Republican on another Republican, characterizing a whole group of people and making blanket assumptions about them. But I long ago learned to pay little attention to Bernie's posts Fred Camper Chicago On

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2016-12-09 Thread Pablo Marin
Now who's the elderly, rural pedagogue. Nothing more elder and rural than the (recurrent) blind trust in the future... On Friday, December 9, 2016 11:21 AM, Bernard Roddy wrote: Down with filmmakers, long live film!  What is a filmmaker today?  Who amongst

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2013-11-26 Thread Francisco Torres
''but how would we know that is really all that's going on?'' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqZKUx91MFI On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Bernard Roddy rodd...@yahoo.com wrote: I've been thinking about films that express an impatience with achievement. An initial form of this would be the

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2013-11-26 Thread r e
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Bernard Roddy rodd...@yahoo.com wrote: given a certain context of achievement, would indeed appear to be a failure, but in which . . tadaaa! . . the artist has moved beyond any such wanna-be status into a strange space occupied by a particular obsession Hi

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2013-11-26 Thread Bernard Roddy
Thanks.  Pip once replied to a post with an example.  A student using a camcorder hits play when he intends to stop and stop when he intends to play.   Imagine that going on for some time.  The result would be an example of what I have in mind - impossible to take much credit for!  And yet . .

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2013-11-26 Thread re
Ahh interesting. That example clarifies a little for me. I see how it applies to your criteria: given a certain context of achievement, would indeed appear to be a failure, but in which . . tadaaa! . . the artist has moved beyond but not how it constitutes a strange space occupied by a

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2013-11-26 Thread Bernard Roddy
I correct myself: the student hits record when he means to stop recording, he hits stop when he thinks he's recording.   There was no video.  It was an example Pip gave for some thread a couple years ago. The obsession would appear when the mistake is adopted as that which is of primary

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2013-11-02 Thread Herb Theriault
D-19 has always worked best for me. D-76, in my experience, has produced low contrast / milky negatives, with 7266, 7231 and 3378. Herb petehumble petehum...@yahoo.com wrote: ___ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2013-10-31 Thread Roger Wilson
Hi Daniel I prefer D19 myself and recently used the D76 because it was all I had and was not happy with the results. I will go back to D19. Roger D. Wilson613 324 - 7504rogerdwilson@sympatico.cahttp://www.rogerdwilson.ca Without failure you can never achieve success. I have based my process and

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2013-10-31 Thread Jon Behrens
D76 always works great for me Sent from my iPhone On Oct 31, 2013, at 6:17 AM, Roger Wilson rogerdwil...@sympatico.ca wrote: Hi Daniel I prefer D19 myself and recently used the D76 because it was all I had and was not happy with the results. I will go back to D19. Roger D. Wilson

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2013-10-31 Thread Scott Dorsey
D76 is fine for negative processing. It was, in fact, originally designed for hand-processing 35mm motion picture film. D76 will get your gamma in the range of 0.6 to 0.7 if you time it right, which is about where you want to be for a negative. However, if you want a first developer for

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2013-10-31 Thread Tara Nelson
Here is the formula I use, with D-19 Developer. It works very well. For negative, skip to step 11 after step 3: 1. Water Wash 3 MINUTES 2. 1st Developer: Kodak D-19 5 MINUTES *Save this developer, you will use it again at step

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2013-10-31 Thread Ryder White
Hi Daniel, We've often used D-76 in our workshops because it's half the price of D-19 if you're buying it off the shelf (which we do). If you're mixing your own, however, you might not have that issue and I'd have to say all things being equal that I prefer the D-19 (just to add my voice to the

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2013-10-31 Thread Jorge Lorenzo Flores Garza
I do use D-76 in a class but it is all done very fast and inexactly (without exact water temperature). More for testing and getting a glimpse of hand processing. But I have to say that the results are pretty good. I leave the roll negative and then transfer it to video from the projected

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2013-09-27 Thread Pip Chodorov
In the headers of every FrameWorks post you can find two links to unsubscribe : List-Unsubscribe: https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/options/frameworks, mailto:frameworks-requ...@jonasmekasfilms.com?subject=unsubscribe -Pip Chodorov At 17:05 -0400 27/09/13, Haley Markbreiter wrote:

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2013-02-25 Thread Heath Iverson
HI Tony, Thanks for letting me know about Film Electrocutions. Do you think the image you finally achieved was a result of the luminosity of the electrical arc? Or do you think the electricity might have chemically or physically effected the emulsion in other ways as well? Are your Electrocution

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2013-02-20 Thread Tony Conrad
Hi Heath- In 1974 I produced several hundred feet of Film Electrocutions. The film was wetted with a salt solution and drawn between two electrodes at 9000vac in the dark. This resulted in arcing across the width of the 16mm DP negative, with the flashing concentrated between the sprocket

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2012-06-17 Thread franco base
Hi. i buy(?)that printer from Munich. The man say that it doesn' t work. You think that I can go to Muncih(1000 km ) to take the printer? is it easy to repair? f. 2012/6/17 R.L. Wilson twoin...@hotmail.com

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2012-04-02 Thread Mark Toscano
Sorry, I think it's fixed now.  Jeez, first time for me... Mark T From: Huckleberry Lain huckleberryl...@gmail.com To: Mark Toscano fiddy...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, April 2, 2012 8:10 PM Subject: Re: [Frameworks] (no subject) uh oh.  Someone's email got

Re: [Frameworks] (no subject)

2012-04-02 Thread Daina Krumins
This must be a scam.  It sounds just too good to be true.  Has anyone sensible tried it? From: Mark Toscano fiddy...@yahoo.com To: mbird-...@netspace.org; u...@ftc.gov; thomas2.marsh...@prudential.com; fleethebe...@yahoo.com; frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com;