The old school workflow of workprint/conform/let the lab do the rest was
premised on making a number of release prints from the conformed original. I’m
assuming Esperanza asked her question because she wants to project the work
from photochemical film for some reason, not digitally. The question
Yes, that could be a problem. I actually have a workprint, so I could
perfectly work that way and avoid altering/dusting the negative.
Cheers
2017-10-23 4:42 GMT+02:00 Fred Camper :
>
> On 10/22/2017 8:46 PM, Jeff Kreines wrote:
>
> We did “cull” our original (usually reversal, back in the day)
On 10/22/2017 8:46 PM, Jeff Kreines wrote:
We did “cull” our original (usually reversal, back in the day) before
workprinting, to save every last penny.
As did big-budget Hollywood films -- that was the difference between the
director ending a take with a call of “cut,“ or “cut print.“
Cutt
We did “cull” our original (usually reversal, back in the day) before
workprinting, to save every last penny.
Bob uses the word “timing” below, but be aware that that word means both the
pacing/duration of shots and how the lab color-corrects a shot when printing —
the person who did that was