Re: [Frameworks] Footage equivalency

2013-04-29 Thread J Vent
Awesome- Thanks to Ed, Ekrem and Roger, very helpful info. Ed, would you be willing to you describe your basic set up and process? As far as chemistry goes, how many feet are reasonable to expect to get from a gallon run of e-6? Thanks for the great info thus far! Joe Ventress On Sun, Apr

Re: [Frameworks] Footage equivalency

2013-04-28 Thread Francisco Torres
http://www.rogerandfrances.com/photoschool/ps%20how%20load%20bulk.html On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 2:19 PM, J Vent jvent.subscripti...@gmail.comwrote: Good morning - I have a Morse, well a Fairchild crank tank processor and a Lomo processor tank, I'm going to be processing with Arista E-6 in it,

Re: [Frameworks] Footage equivalency

2013-04-28 Thread Ed Inman
A 36-exposure roll of 35mm still film is about 5 feet long. If you equate that roughly as equal to 11 feet of 16mm film, a 100-foot roll of 16mm is similar in overall size to 9 rolls of 36-exposure 35mm.-Original Message- From: J Vent Sent: Apr 28, 2013 1:19

Re: [Frameworks] Footage equivalency

2013-04-28 Thread Beebe, Roger
I just woke up from a nap, so maybe my brain isn't working correctly, but shouldn't we be talking about AREA rather than length? That is, a 35mm frame is roughly 4x the area of a 16mm frame, so it requires 4x as much chemistry, not the roughly 2x suggested by the math below. So if 5 feet of

Re: [Frameworks] Footage equivalency

2013-04-28 Thread Francisco Torres
Right, area. 4 X On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Beebe, Roger roge...@ufl.edu wrote: I just woke up from a nap, so maybe my brain isn't working correctly, but shouldn't we be talking about AREA rather than length? That is, a 35mm frame is roughly 4x the area of a 16mm frame, so it

Re: [Frameworks] Footage equivalency

2013-04-28 Thread Ed Inman
l.edu> Sent: Apr 28, 2013 2:53 PM To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Footage equivalency I just woke up from a nap, so maybe my brain isn't working correctly, but shouldn't we be talking about AREA rather than length? That is, a 35mm frame

Re: [Frameworks] Footage equivalency

2013-04-28 Thread Ekrem Serdar
Yeah, area math is what I've always done -- ekremserdar.info austin, tx (Sent from a toy) On Apr 28, 2013, at 14:54, Beebe, Roger roge...@ufl.edu wrote: I just woke up from a nap, so maybe my brain isn't working correctly, but shouldn't we be talking about AREA rather than length? That is, a