Re: [free-software-melb] Excluding free software from patentability

2012-02-13 Thread Ben Sturmfels
On 13/02/12 12:45, Matt Giuca wrote: Having a shorter copyright term, but keeping the long term for free software would mean that the above clause is no longer true. In this world, I would have certain freedoms with proprietary software that I would not have with GPL software. For example, I

Re: [free-software-melb] Excluding free software from patentability

2012-02-13 Thread Matt Giuca
The goal of free software is freedom for people who *use* software. To claim that the ability to restrict other people with proprietary software is a freedom is twisted logic indeed. But that is a freedom. This comes to the double-edged idea that freedom cannot be absolute: if I have

[free-software-melb] Excluding free software from patentability

2012-02-13 Thread Brian May
Hello All, On the subject in the subject line - Excluding free software from patentability - it concerns me that there is a emphasis on software. As demonstrated at LCA2012 there seems to be increasing interest in open hardware, and I think hardware has exactly the same issues as software does

Re: [free-software-melb] Thursday dinner

2012-02-13 Thread Bianca Gibson
What time do meetings normally end? Dinner? Just asking, because if I can attend or not depends on my travel plans being worked out in advance. Ideally I need to be on the 7:17pm or 8:11pm Belgrave train to meet one of the last two buses for the day. Meetings normally finish at 7:30, dinner I