Re: [free-software-melb] Patentology report on Ben Sturmfels at IP Australia event on Software Patents

2012-05-23 Thread Matt Giuca
Bless John Carmack. He's a fantastic example for the games industry. Of course, he doesn't develop free software, but once his technology is reasonably old that there is no further commercial value, he kicks it into GPL mode and breathes a whole new life into it. I can't really ask for more than

Re: [free-software-melb] Patentology report on Ben Sturmfels at IP Australia event on Software Patents

2012-05-22 Thread Les Kitchen
2. Even though Patentology is correct in pointing that the GPL ... Plus, patents != copyright, just because they share the IP umbrella. For the most part it should be pretty trivial for an individual to not violate copyright when writing software, but it can be impossible to even know if

Re: [free-software-melb] Patentology report on Ben Sturmfels at IP Australia event on Software Patents

2012-05-22 Thread Adrian Colomitchi
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Tim Cuthbertson t...@gfxmonk.net wrote: On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Les Kitchen l...@csse.unimelb.edu.au wrote: ... 2. Even though Patentology is correct in pointing that the GPL   (and copyleft) technically relies on copyright law, he omits   to

Re: [free-software-melb] Patentology report on Ben Sturmfels at IP Australia event on Software Patents

2012-05-22 Thread Russell Coker
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Matt Giuca matt.gi...@gmail.com wrote: I can never quite justify why I think software deserves a special exemption from the patent system. I think what it comes down to is that *so very very little* of what we invent is actually non-obvious. I don't wish to deride software

Re: [free-software-melb] Patentology report on Ben Sturmfels at IP Australia event on Software Patents

2012-05-22 Thread Alex Fraser
Well said, Matt. On May 22, 2012 10:37 PM, Matt Giuca matt.gi...@gmail.com wrote: […] If some guy from Australia hadn't invented a way of determining when a machine is significantly changed, chances are pretty bloody high that someone at Microsoft would have. John Carmack has said something

Re: [free-software-melb] Patentology report on Ben Sturmfels at IP Australia event on Software Patents

2012-05-22 Thread Brian May
On 22 May 2012 22:37, Matt Giuca matt.gi...@gmail.com wrote: From what I know about this Ric Richardson, he sounds like a huge patent troll. I may have my facts wrong, so correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm under the understanding that he came up with a DRM system for detecting when software

Re: [free-software-melb] Patentology report on Ben Sturmfels at IP Australia event on Software Patents

2012-05-21 Thread Les Kitchen
http://blog.patentology.com.au/2012/05/bickering-about-software-patents-misses.html Yeah. Even though Patentology seems to come out in favor of (software) patents, he seems at least to give a sane account of the contending sides -- considering that being a patent attorney it's clear on which

Re: [free-software-melb] Patentology report on Ben Sturmfels at IP Australia event on Software Patents

2012-05-21 Thread Les Kitchen
4. I also noticed a link to his commentary from early this on s/from early this on/from early this year on/ ___ Free-software-melb mailing list Free-software-melb@lists.softwarefreedom.com.au

Re: [free-software-melb] Patentology report on Ben Sturmfels at IP Australia event on Software Patents

2012-05-21 Thread Les Kitchen
One could accuse them of intellectual cowardice. Or at the very least, engaging in a campaign of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt. Yeah, Lev, on second reading it does seems to smell more like FUD. -- Smiles, Les. ___ Free-software-melb mailing list