Adam Bolte abo...@systemsaviour.com
writes:
Given that the Debian project rejects the GNU Free Documentation
License from main - a stance which I strongly disagree with
I'm surprised by that. Both because that gets the facts wrong, and
because you support the non-free FDL.
The FDL is not a
Adam Bolte abo...@systemsaviour.com
writes:
Given that the Debian project rejects [some works under] the GNU Free
Documentation License from main - a stance which I strongly disagree
with - I'm surprised they consider trademarks at all for the same kind
of reasoning.
As for the Debian
On 21/07/13 13:02, Ben Finney wrote:
But those either ignore or punt the issue to trademark. The question
still remains: what restrictions on the freedom of any recipient are
acceptable in exchange for preventing the societal harms trademark law
is designed to address?
I'm not convinced that
