Adrian Colomitchi acolomit...@gmail.com
writes:
1. there is a distinction between documentation and application software,
even if the distinction is not located in the bitstreams.
Consequence: I cannot agree with the assertion of one can treat
documentation the same way as one can treat
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 23:09 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Adrian Colomitchi acolomit...@gmail.com
writes:
1. there is a distinction between documentation and application software,
even if the distinction is not located in the bitstreams.
Consequence: I cannot agree with the assertion of one
Adrian Colomitchi acolomit...@gmail.com
writes:
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 23:09 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
I've shown that “because the copyright holder decrees that this work
won't be used as anything but a document” is not a justification for
those restrictions.
The way I see the things: the
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:42:56AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Adrian Colomitchi acolomit...@gmail.com writes:
But any other works derived from the said documentation that are used
*for other purposes* won't be restricted by copyright law, no matter
the license under which the original
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:12:56AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
On 24 July 2013 08:43, Adrian Colomitchi acolomit...@gmail.com wrote:
If I change an open source program, chances are the original documentation
no longer applies any more. So I really should be updating the
documentation too. If
