OK. I think I fall into the inactive (or sporadically active) category. :)
c
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Mark B. Elrod wrote:
> basically the way we handle granting check in access to cvs is to look at how active
> people are and how good their patches are. if a person sends us patches that te
basically the way we handle granting check in access to cvs is to look at how active
people are and how good their patches are. if a person sends us patches that tend to
break things we don't want them arbitrarily checking stuff in . also, if they are
not going to be active it is better for us to
Yes. Of course, I have no check-in access to the CVS archives. :)
c
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Mark B. Elrod wrote:
> this is a potential fix. i woulsd still like to figure out why i have to put the
> cast there at all for vc5. if i define STRICT it will compile without the cast
> liek it doe
this is a potential fix. i woulsd still like to figure out why i have to put the
cast there at all for vc5. if i define STRICT it will compile without the cast
liek it does in other places but then it is unable to link due to another function
in that file... all in all it is very frustrating. your
It just occurred to me that the compile errors people have been complaining
about
( see http://www.freeamp.org/pipermail/freeamp-dev/1999-December/39.html
and http://www.freeamp.org/pipermail/freeamp-dev/2000-February/000282.html )
can be solved in the short term with by switching on the _
