> I found freeamp recently and i really love it.
I'm glad you like it.
> Except for its numerous bugs and 20% more
> time consuming it beats winamp undoubtedly.
> Speed isn't something you should worry about
> (too much) but bugs .... maybe you should clear
> all bugs before implementing new features...
Well, the tough part about fixing the bugs is that we don't really know what
they all are yet.
> About 2.1beta1
> 2) there are still warnings wich could & should be resolved with casts
> (i think it's faster to do it yourself than to implement my changes
> so i'm not sending anything)
> 3) you're not killing threads correctly. after few minutes there is more
> than 400 active threads
I haven't seen this happen -- does it still happen with beta 3? Beta 3 will
be released within a few hours -- please check it out.
> OK, this was a bug report. (Sorry, but I hate bugzilla.)
We would really prefer you to use bugzilla to report bugs. This way you will
not report bugs that have already been reported (and fixed!), which will
save you and us time.
> There are more bugs, but I'd like to have beta2 to continue testing.
Check out beta 3 -- the bugs you've mentioned may have already been fixed.
--ruaok Hindsight is always 50/50.
Robert Kaye -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.emusic.com
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.freeamp.org/mailman/listinfo/freeamp-dev
