Re: freeamp's memory footprint?
I'm sure elrod will send out an announcement soon, but Karl would probably be happy to know Freeamp 2.0.6 is released. I haven't tested yet. On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Mark B. Elrod wrote: > Due to some stuff I needed to do on win32 I pushed the date to monday. > Sorry ... > > elrod > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.freeamp.org/mailman/listinfo/freeamp-dev
Re: freeamp's memory footprint?
Due to some stuff I needed to do on win32 I pushed the date to monday. Sorry ... elrod Karl Ove Hufthammer wrote: > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 2:24 PM > Subject: Re: freeamp's memory footprint? > > > There is a bug in 2.0.3 - 2.0.5 that will chew up a bunch of memory > > when FreeAmp switches tracks. We're going to release the 2.0.6 on > > friday, so please check that out and let us know if it still chews up > a > > bunch of memory. > > Well, it's Sunday now (at least in Norway), and no 2.0.6 ... :( > > --# > Regards, > Karl Ove Hufthammer > FreeAmp fan :) > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.freeamp.org/mailman/listinfo/freeamp-dev ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.freeamp.org/mailman/listinfo/freeamp-dev
Re: freeamp's memory footprint?
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 2:24 PM Subject: Re: freeamp's memory footprint? > There is a bug in 2.0.3 - 2.0.5 that will chew up a bunch of memory > when FreeAmp switches tracks. We're going to release the 2.0.6 on > friday, so please check that out and let us know if it still chews up a > bunch of memory. Well, it's Sunday now (at least in Norway), and no 2.0.6 ... :( --# Regards, Karl Ove Hufthammer FreeAmp fan :) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.freeamp.org/mailman/listinfo/freeamp-dev
Re: freeamp's memory footprint?
On 20 Mar, Man Chi Ly wrote: > my environment: > > Red Hat 6.1 w/ latest updates > P3-450/128 w/ on-board Crystal 4232 chipset > > I'm seeing freeamp chew up a lot of memory.. here are some lines from top > (during mp3 playback); although frankly I'm not an expert at understanding > all the figures. How large should the memory footprint be? > > Mem: 127884K av, 124780K used, 3104K free, 27856K shrd, 2620K buff > Swap: 361420K av, 56452K used, 304968K free 18324K cached > > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT LIB %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND > 922 mly0 0 61560 26M 1596 S 0 0.0 21.4 0:00 freeamp > 923 mly0 0 61560 26M 1596 S 0 0.0 21.4 0:00 freeamp > 925 mly0 0 61560 26M 1596 S 0 0.0 21.4 0:00 freeamp > 926 mly0 0 61560 26M 1596 S 0 0.0 21.4 0:08 freeamp > 927 mly0 0 61560 26M 1596 S 0 0.0 21.4 0:00 freeamp > 929 mly0 0 61560 26M 1596 S 0 0.0 21.4 0:07 freeamp > 1978 mly0 0 61560 26M 1596 R 0 0.0 21.4 0:00 freeamp > 1979 mly0 0 61560 26M 1596 S 0 0.0 21.4 0:00 freeamp > 1980 mly0 0 61560 26M 1596 S 0 0.0 21.4 0:00 freeamp There is a bug in 2.0.3 - 2.0.5 that will chew up a bunch of memory when FreeAmp switches tracks. We're going to release the 2.0.6 on friday, so please check that out and let us know if it still chews up a bunch of memory. --ruaok Freezerburn! All else is only icing. -- Soul Coughing Robert Kaye -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://moon.eorbit.net/~robert ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.freeamp.org/mailman/listinfo/freeamp-dev
