on 13/09/2010 20:07 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> I am also going to take a look how Linux and OpenSolaris name the C-states.
Well, Linux does what you suggested, it uses index of a C-state as its name.
There is one difference from our current code - if a C-state is skipped for some
reason, t
on 14/09/2010 11:44 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 13/09/2010 20:07 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> I am also going to take a look how Linux and OpenSolaris name the C-states.
>
> Well, Linux does what you suggested, it uses index of a C-state as its name.
> There is one difference from
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 14/09/2010 11:44 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> on 13/09/2010 20:07 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>> I am also going to take a look how Linux and OpenSolaris name the C-states.
>> Well, Linux does what you suggested, it uses index of a C-state as its name.
>> There
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 13/09/2010 20:07 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> I am also going to take a look how Linux and OpenSolaris name the C-states.
>
> Well, Linux does what you suggested, it uses index of a C-state as its name.
> There is one difference from our current code - if a C-state
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:44:45 +0300
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Additionally, it seems that we do not currently have any support for
> Functional
> Fixed Hardware (FFH) way of providing C states. In this case _CST returns GAS
> of a register used to enter a C state with address space ID set to
> ACPI_
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:01:24 +0900
Taku YAMAMOTO wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:44:45 +0300
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> > Additionally, it seems that we do not currently have any support for
> > Functional
> > Fixed Hardware (FFH) way of providing C states. In this case _CST returns
> > GAS
>
