Can you clarify what you mean? Performance benchmarks like that are,
after all, often of limited value when it comes to why one might choose
one OS over another. A lot of other things factor into the decision.
Security, stability, consistency, ease of configuration and
administration, etc.
Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
> here are the consequences of putting a CoC up high on the priority list:
> https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article=windows-freebsd112-8linux=1
FreeBSD performance is really bad on some comparisons there.
> Focusing on software would have made FreeBSD do
The plan is to do another revision, this time in public. We've already done
the first round of data collection and have data to inform the revisions.
Now that core election is done, progress can be made.
Replying point by point to this misleading and slanted assessment is not
wothwhile.
Warner
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 5:26 PM, Erich Dollansky <
freebsd.ed.li...@sumeritec.com> wrote:
>
> Does anybody need more:
>
> Keep it civil.
> Be tolerant.
> Remember that you are in public and that your actions determine the
> public perception of the project. Do not make it personal.
Hi,
do you think that this will bring back programmers?
Erich
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 12:43:10 -0600
Warner Losh wrote:
> The plan is to do another revision, this time in public. We've
> already done the first round of data collection and have data to
> inform the revisions. Now that core
Which ones left, exactly?
Warner
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Erich Dollansky <
freebsd.ed.li...@sumeritec.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> do you think that this will bring back programmers?
>
> Erich
>
>
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 12:43:10 -0600
> Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > The plan is to do another
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
do you think that this will bring back programmers?
No one who was making significant contributions to architectual
performance problems has left or stopped their contributions. We lost a
few ports committers, at least one of which was
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 7:31 PM Warner Losh wrote:
> Such overly-simply CoCs have proven unworkable in the past. They were OK in
> the 90's, but we live in a different internet world today. These are good
> guidelines and great advice, but make it hard to take action when
> necessary. I wish it
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018, 6:20 PM Andras Farkas
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 7:31 PM Warner Losh wrote:
> > Such overly-simply CoCs have proven unworkable in the past. They were OK
> in
> > the 90's, but we live in a different internet world today. These are good
> > guidelines and great
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:24 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018, 6:20 PM Andras Farkas
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 7:31 PM Warner Losh wrote:
> > > Such overly-simply CoCs have proven unworkable in the past. They were
> OK
> > in
> > > the 90's, but we live in a
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Adam wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:24 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018, 6:20 PM Andras Farkas
wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 7:31 PM Warner Losh wrote:
Such overly-simply CoCs have proven unworkable in the past. They were
OK
in
the 90's, but we
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Adam wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:24 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018, 6:20 PM Andras Farkas
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 7:31 PM Warner Losh
wrote:
> > Such overly-simply CoCs have proven unworkable in the past.
Hi,
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 20:21:30 +0200
"Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
> Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > Hi,
> > here are the consequences of putting a CoC up high on the priority
> > list:
> > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article=windows-freebsd112-8linux=1
> >
>
> FreeBSD performance is
13 matches
Mail list logo
