Re: Why no SAP nor DB2 on FreeBSD ?

2009-09-28 Thread Ivan Voras
Saifi Khan wrote:
 Hi all:
 
 In continuation of my investigation of Oracle, i also noticed
 that there is:
  . no SAP for FreeBSD
  . no DB2 for FreeBSD
  . no Sybase ASE for FreeBSD
  . no Informix for FreeBSD 
 
 Discouing PostgreSql installations, effectively enterprise
 database setups have given FreeBSD a miss. 
 What could be reason for this ?

An obvious guess would be that the userbase is too small and that makes
it unprofitable to support the products on FreeBSD.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Why no SAP nor DB2 on FreeBSD ?

2009-09-28 Thread Tony Theodore
2009/9/28 Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org

 Saifi Khan wrote:
  Hi all:
 
  In continuation of my investigation of Oracle, i also noticed
  that there is:
   . no SAP for FreeBSD
   . no DB2 for FreeBSD
   . no Sybase ASE for FreeBSD
   . no Informix for FreeBSD
 
  Discouing PostgreSql installations, effectively enterprise
  database setups have given FreeBSD a miss.
  What could be reason for this ?

 An obvious guess would be that the userbase is too small and that makes
 it unprofitable to support the products on FreeBSD.

 Which then leads the FreeBSD community to give those products a miss and
use alternatives, or find ways of running them without vendor support, which
further reduces demand.

I guess from an advocacy perspective, it's hard to get enthused about this
as the alternatives seem more attractive. It's not like hardware drivers
that do constrain usage and development.

Tony
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Why no SAP nor DB2 on FreeBSD ?

2009-09-28 Thread Saifi Khan
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Ivan Voras wrote:

 Saifi Khan wrote:
  Hi all:
  
  In continuation of my investigation of Oracle, i also noticed
  that there is:
   . no SAP for FreeBSD
   . no DB2 for FreeBSD
   . no Sybase ASE for FreeBSD
   . no Informix for FreeBSD 
  
  Discouing PostgreSql installations, effectively enterprise
  database setups have given FreeBSD a miss. 
  What could be reason for this ?
 
 An obvious guess would be that the userbase is too small and that makes
 it unprofitable to support the products on FreeBSD.
 

Thanks for providing the perspective on the issue.

Here is a rather straight query, how do we grow the userbase ?


thanks
Saifi.

___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


2008 EuroBSDCon PDF and Audio ?

2009-09-28 Thread Saifi Khan
Hi:

Every year the EuroBSDCon has a new host site and the slides and
audio/video seem to go missing after a while.

i'm trying to locate the stuff in 2009, about the 2008 EuroBSDCon 
talks page at http://2008.eurobsdcon.org/talks.html

Does anybody know how the various slides and audio/video can be
retrieved ?

Please excuse me as i am a newbie and was wondering if there is
a technical reason for not having the slides and media stuff
consolidated at a single site ?

Thanks in advance.


thanks
Saifi.

___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Why no SAP nor DB2 on FreeBSD ?

2009-09-28 Thread Julian H. Stacey
 Thanks for providing the perspective on the issue.
 
 Here is a rather straight query, how do we grow the userbase ?

IMO enough noise.

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey: BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
  Mail ASCII plain text not HTML  Base64.  http://asciiribbon.org
  Virused Microsoft PCs cause spam. http://berklix.com/free/
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: 2008 EuroBSDCon PDF and Audio ?

2009-09-28 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi,
Reference:
 From: Saifi Khan saifi.k...@datasynergy.org 
 Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:35:30 +0530 (IST) 
 Message-id:   alpine.bsf.2.00.0909281729110.99...@freebsd 

Saifi Khan wrote:
 Hi:
 
 Every year the EuroBSDCon has a new host site and the slides and
 audio/video seem to go missing after a while.
 
 i'm trying to locate the stuff in 2009, about the 2008 EuroBSDCon 
 talks page at http://2008.eurobsdcon.org/talks.html
 
 Does anybody know how the various slides and audio/video can be
 retrieved ?
 
 Please excuse me as i am a newbie and was wondering if there is
 a technical reason for not having the slides and media stuff
 consolidated at a single site ?

[I believe I know the answer to that, but] ...  I don't see it does
any good for you to ask  get answers on that question via advocay@,
'cos that's not where those responsible could best be Direct contacted
to improve things.

Please think where you should first direct address your many
questions. Dont dump all to advoc...@freebsd.org.  eg in this case
use the whois command for the domain name @eurobsdcon.org,  First
mail there, or to postmas...@eurobsdcon.org or webmas...@eurobsdcon.org

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey: BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
  Mail ASCII plain text not HTML  Base64.  http://asciiribbon.org
  Virused Microsoft PCs cause spam. http://berklix.com/free/
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: freebsd-advocacy Digest, Vol 295, Issue 1

2009-09-28 Thread Kevin Hatfield
 and
 professional solution if you ask me, just because its not point and
 click friendly shouldn't be some kind of excuse, to me its and clean and
 pure as I could dream.

 We hired a person directly from Oracle full time to build a new database
 project on Oracle. After it was all built and been using it for about 2
 years I just thought it was a bit of a disgrace. Oracle is brittle,
 unreliable and expensive. We had FreeBSD+MySQL along side it the whole
 time and it was just so much more reliable and faster for the same
 amount of hardware.
 Oracle by packaged design is meant to encourage a comparatively massive
 amount of hardware investment compared to what could be achieved with
 MySQL and FreeBSD. I think it is just as much about masking its crap
 performance then any other argument.

 I think Oracle is a about of system of making money out of false
 beliefs, it takes full advantage of corporate companies conservative
 beliefs and is probably only the reasonable solution for at best 5% of
 the companies it lives at, its all a matter of opinion which would be
 argued more from how much money a set of individuals are making out of
 it over a better technical solution.
 Some how Oracle want people to believe that a few 100's thousand dollars
 for their software is vastly superior to any other DB in the world is
 just nonsense.
 There is not any other mass scale pieces of software that most company's
 need where there is some how a magically vastly superior solution. There
 is no single/few license $100,000 operating system, no single/few
 license $100,000 excel, no single/few license $100,000 web server.

 I guess what I am saying at the end of this is that if you can avoid
 Oracle that is great, I fully recommend you do.

 Just because you can buy MySQL Enterprise Server far more cheaply and
 install/deploy it far more easily on more different platforms isn't
 something to be suspicious about, its just a better software solution
 and I recommend you take full advantage of it while you still can.














 --

 Message: 5
 Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:49:36 +0200
 From: Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org
 Subject: Re: Why no SAP nor DB2 on FreeBSD ?
 To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
 Message-ID: h9ptb8$oi...@ger.gmane.org
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

 Saifi Khan wrote:
 Hi all:

 In continuation of my investigation of Oracle, i also noticed
 that there is:
  . no SAP for FreeBSD
  . no DB2 for FreeBSD
  . no Sybase ASE for FreeBSD
  . no Informix for FreeBSD

 Discouing PostgreSql installations, effectively enterprise
 database setups have given FreeBSD a miss.
 What could be reason for this ?

 An obvious guess would be that the userbase is too small and that makes
 it unprofitable to support the products on FreeBSD.

 -- next part --
 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
 Name: signature.asc
 Type: application/pgp-signature
 Size: 259 bytes
 Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
 Url :
 http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy/attachments/20090928/986fcfbf/signature-0001.pgp

 --

 Message: 6
 Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:20:23 +1000
 From: Tony Theodore to...@logyst.com
 Subject: Re: Why no SAP nor DB2 on FreeBSD ?
 To: Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org
 Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
 Message-ID:
   22166b750909280320r3356c113l8d54e46279f27...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

 2009/9/28 Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org

 Saifi Khan wrote:
  Hi all:
 
  In continuation of my investigation of Oracle, i also noticed
  that there is:
   . no SAP for FreeBSD
   . no DB2 for FreeBSD
   . no Sybase ASE for FreeBSD
   . no Informix for FreeBSD
 
  Discouing PostgreSql installations, effectively enterprise
  database setups have given FreeBSD a miss.
  What could be reason for this ?

 An obvious guess would be that the userbase is too small and that makes
 it unprofitable to support the products on FreeBSD.

 Which then leads the FreeBSD community to give those products a miss and
 use alternatives, or find ways of running them without vendor support, which
 further reduces demand.

 I guess from an advocacy perspective, it's hard to get enthused about this
 as the alternatives seem more attractive. It's not like hardware drivers
 that do constrain usage and development.

 Tony


 --

 Message: 7
 Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:00:37 +0530 (IST)
 From: Saifi Khan saifi.k...@datasynergy.org
 Subject: Re: Why no SAP nor DB2 on FreeBSD ?
 To: Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org
 Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
 Message-ID: alpine.bsf.2.00.0909281659210.98...@freebsd
 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

 On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Ivan Voras wrote:

 Saifi Khan wrote:
  Hi all:
 
  In continuation of my investigation of Oracle, i also noticed
  that there is:
   . no SAP for FreeBSD
   . no DB2 for FreeBSD
   . no Sybase ASE for FreeBSD
   . no Informix for FreeBSD
 
  Discouing

Re: Why no SAP nor DB2 on FreeBSD ?

2009-09-28 Thread Ivan Voras
2009/9/28 Saifi Khan saifi.k...@datasynergy.org:
 On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Ivan Voras wrote:

 Saifi Khan wrote:
  Hi all:
 
  In continuation of my investigation of Oracle, i also noticed
  that there is:
   . no SAP for FreeBSD
   . no DB2 for FreeBSD
   . no Sybase ASE for FreeBSD
   . no Informix for FreeBSD
 
  Discouing PostgreSql installations, effectively enterprise
  database setups have given FreeBSD a miss.
  What could be reason for this ?

 An obvious guess would be that the userbase is too small and that makes
 it unprofitable to support the products on FreeBSD.


 Thanks for providing the perspective on the issue.

 Here is a rather straight query, how do we grow the userbase ?

Something like that is very tedious and hard, mostly because it's a
chicken-and-the-end problem. Vendors will not develop products (and
device drivers) for platforms with few users because it's
unprofitable, and users will not use new platforms that have low
vendor support. For a very pertinent example, see Linux - it has a
vastly bigger user base and it's still largely unsupported by sw  hw
vendors.

There is no completely right solution for this - you can't even
create a global survey of users that would possibly use a new platform
if it were supported and submit it to vendors because the users  are
not well enough informed about it.

One angle that would be interesting to play with vendors would be the
BSD license - enabling them to create proprietary solutions  - but
apparently vendors are not that scared of the GPL.
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: freebsd-advocacy Digest, Vol 295, Issue 1

2009-09-28 Thread Andrea Brancatelli

Il 28/09/2009 14.38, Kevin Hatfield ha scritto:

The simplest most effective way to grow the FreeBSD userbase is
indemnification. Large companies that purchase RHEL/SuSE, etc. It's
not because they don't know what they're doing as someone mentioned
above. Most of the large Enterprise RHEL/SUSE contracts come down to
indemnification with support being a bonus.

   


I strongly agree and also share my personal experience in deploying a 
massive system (3600 distributed boxes) in which Red Hat was adopted and 
FreeBSD (even if the project would actually work better under FreeBSD) 
just becase if we run out of ideas we can always call red hat italy.


This is a huge problem.
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


leveraging FOSS, especially FreeBSD

2009-09-28 Thread Don Wilde
http://www.engineeringjobfuture.com/articles/leverage/open-source-software

-- 
-- Don Wilde
Engineering the Future 
http://www.EngineeringJobFuture.com
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FreeBSD 8.0 vs. Ubuntu 9.10 Benchmarks (also fbsd 7.2)

2009-09-28 Thread Jan Husar
check it out

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=freebsd8_ubuntu910num=1


Jan

-- 
---
|  Jan Husar
|
| doing what matters
| http://www.earthcause.org
| http://www.skosi.org

Open Source mission to Kosovo and eastern balcans
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=125834024563

Open Source mission to save Galapagos Islands
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=43708354604
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: leveraging FOSS, especially FreeBSD

2009-09-28 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi,
 From: Don Wilde dwil...@gmail.com 

Don Wilde wrote:
 http://www.engineeringjobfuture.com/articles/leverage/open-source-software

Article contains
The lawsuit was bitterly contested, but finally resolved.
Everything developed before 1970 was declared by a judge
to be open forever more, and everything developed after
that was ATT's property.

False. I stopped reading at that point, after all, the journalist
was probably just winging it, after a few emails to people who read
the activity at the time (inc many of us doubtless).

The people who know Most about the UCB Lite agreement, won't speak much
anyway - they signed non disclosures.

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey: BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
  Mail ASCII plain text not HTML  Base64.  http://asciiribbon.org
  Virused Microsoft PCs cause spam. http://berklix.com/free/
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: leveraging FOSS, especially FreeBSD

2009-09-28 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Don Wilde wrote:
 What is incorrect, Julian? 
.. etc.

In 1977 I started learning Unix V6 as a Unix newbie.  There were
no UCB bits I heard of till csh  job control  vi floated in to
my Uni. a few years on, maybe 1980 +/- a year or 2, I'd guess about
82.  Can't remember when I heard of first complete BSD releases for
PDP/VAX but after the individual bits.

man 3 ctime
The functions ctime(), gmtime() and localtime() all take
as an argument a time value representing the time in seconds
since the Epoch (00:00:00 UTC, January 1, 1970; see time(3)).

1970 in context quoted below ? No. 

 On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
  From:         Don Wilde dwil...@gmail.com
  Don Wilde wrote:
  http://www.engineeringjobfuture.com/articles/leverage/open-source-software
  Article contains
         The lawsuit was bitterly contested, but finally resolved.
         Everything developed before 1970 was declared by a judge
         to be open forever more, and everything developed after
         that was ATT's property.
 
  False. I stopped reading at that point, after all, the journalist
  was probably just winging it, after a few emails to people who read
  the activity at the time (inc many of us doubtless).
 
  The people who know Most about the UCB Lite agreement, won't speak much
  anyway - they signed non disclosures.
 
 -- 
 -- Don Wilde
 Engineering the Future 
 http://www.EngineeringJobFuture.com

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey: BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
  Mail ASCII plain text not HTML  Base64.  http://asciiribbon.org
  Virused Microsoft PCs cause spam. http://berklix.com/free/
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: leveraging FOSS, especially FreeBSD

2009-09-28 Thread Don Wilde
Thank you, Julian -

Me bits be scrambled, methinks. Apologies all, correcting it I am now.,

For the record, the agreement was made in 1994. Here is the complete text.

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20041126130302760  -- :D

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
 Don Wilde wrote:
 What is incorrect, Julian?
 .. etc.

 In 1977 I started learning Unix V6 as a Unix newbie.  There were
 no UCB bits I heard of till csh  job control  vi floated in to
 my Uni. a few years on, maybe 1980 +/- a year or 2, I'd guess about
 82.  Can't remember when I heard of first complete BSD releases for
 PDP/VAX but after the individual bits.

 man 3 ctime
        The functions ctime(), gmtime() and localtime() all take
        as an argument a time value representing the time in seconds
        since the Epoch (00:00:00 UTC, January 1, 1970; see time(3)).

 1970 in context quoted below ? No.

 On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
  From:         Don Wilde dwil...@gmail.com
  Don Wilde wrote:
  http://www.engineeringjobfuture.com/articles/leverage/open-source-software
  Article contains
         The lawsuit was bitterly contested, but finally resolved.
         Everything developed before 1970 was declared by a judge
         to be open forever more, and everything developed after
         that was ATT's property.
 
  False. I stopped reading at that point, after all, the journalist
  was probably just winging it, after a few emails to people who read
  the activity at the time (inc many of us doubtless).
 
  The people who know Most about the UCB Lite agreement, won't speak much
  anyway - they signed non disclosures.

 --
 -- Don Wilde
     Engineering the Future 
 http://www.EngineeringJobFuture.com

 Cheers,
 Julian
 --
 Julian Stacey: BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
  Mail ASCII plain text not HTML  Base64.      http://asciiribbon.org
  Virused Microsoft PCs cause spam.             http://berklix.com/free/




-- 
-- Don Wilde
Engineering the Future 
http://www.EngineeringJobFuture.com
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: leveraging FOSS, especially FreeBSD

2009-09-28 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Don Wilde dwil...@gmail.com writes:
 What is incorrect, Julian?

Pretty much everything about the lawsuit.

http://oreilly.com/catalog/opensources/book/kirkmck.html
http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/USLsettlement.pdf

I found the phrase everything developed before 1970 particularly
amusing, as it translates to approximately zero, plus or minus zero.

Oh, and pretty much everything else as well.

The practice of sharing source code without compensation (and the term
copyleft) can be traced to a hobbyist magazine that later developed
into Dr Dobb's, and predates 3BSD (1BSD and 2BSD were only add-ons, not
OS distributions) by about five years.  The first explicit discussion of
free software as such was in an article published in the July 1976 issue
of SIGPLAN in reaction to Bill Gate's (in)famous open letter.  The
first organized F/OSS movement was, like it or not, the GNU Project
started by Richard Stallman in 1983.  At that time, BSD was distributed
only to institutions that already held an ATT source code license.  The
network stack was open sourced in the late eighties, the rest of the
system in the early-to-mid nineties.

 He was drinking beer by the pitcher, so I'm sure he was more
 forthcoming than usual.

I neither know nor care whether that statement is true, but it's not a
particularly nice thing to say about anyone.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: leveraging FOSS, especially FreeBSD

2009-09-28 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Don Wilde dwil...@gmail.com writes:
 Dag-Erling, I remember you quite well as a core developer, so I don't
 doubt that your knowledge of history is better than mine.

Never been on core.  My knowledge of this matter comes from researching
it (thoroughly) for the history section of a presentation on open source
licensing.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: freebsd-advocacy Digest, Vol 295, Issue 1

2009-09-28 Thread CmdLnKid

On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:20 -, andrea wrote:


Il 28/09/2009 14.38, Kevin Hatfield ha scritto:

The simplest most effective way to grow the FreeBSD userbase is
indemnification. Large companies that purchase RHEL/SuSE, etc. It's
not because they don't know what they're doing as someone mentioned
above. Most of the large Enterprise RHEL/SUSE contracts come down to
indemnification with support being a bonus.




I strongly agree and also share my personal experience in deploying a massive 
system (3600 distributed boxes) in which Red Hat was adopted and FreeBSD 
(even if the project would actually work better under FreeBSD) just becase 
if we run out of ideas we can always call red hat italy.


This is a huge problem.
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org



So basically... Bottom line is we need a stronger commercial support base than 
what is already implemented. Building upon that maybe more attention should be 
posed at getting certified BSD professionals into commercial support 
infrastructure sites that can influence small changes that impact future growth 
and funding.


Personally I am working on a company that is not even 1 city block away from me 
and at this time they support all forms of Linux and they are a remote IT 
support type entity that is handling database technologies and VoIP. I am 
looking at coming on as a BSD advocate to broaden their range of support.


If there is any suggestions that I could make as a selling point for a career at 
a company that does not offer any type of BSD support yet, I would certainly 
appreciate any feedback and ideas.


Best regards

Were Here

--

  - (2^(N-1))
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org