Re: FreeBSD stickers?

2006-04-15 Thread Christer Hermansson

Steve Rikli wrote:

Are the original FreeBSD sticker sheets still available anywhere?

I'm thinking of the approx 4"x6" label sheet, and it had 2 larger
"Powered By" stickers, 3 smaller white "Powered By" stickers, and
then a half dozen little PC case badge-sized "Powered By" and/or
Beastie stickers.

These used to come gratis with the official CD sets IIRC.

The "domed" PC case badges available from various places are great,
but the "Powered By" sticker sheets were nice when you had a stack
of systems to sorta show off a little.  ;-)

cheers,
sr.
  

You can find sticker sheet at FreeBSDmall

http://www.freebsdmall.com/cgi-bin/fm/bsdsticker?id=gZ6ecBgf&mv_pc=114

CH

--

http://www.chdevelopment.se/

"Be honest and you can demand honesty,
be loyal and you can demand loyalty,
show respect and you can demand respect."


___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: i386 do not support i386

2005-11-24 Thread Christer Hermansson

Christer Hermansson wrote:


Hi.

FreeBSD 6.0R don't support 386 processors according to the release 
notes, maybe it's time to change the name of the i386 platform to the 
x86 platform.


Not very important issue for me but it feels little strange to have a 
i386 platform that don't support/work on i386 processors.


http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/relnotes-i386.html#KERNEL
"Support for 80386 processors (the I386_CPU kernel configuration 
option) has been removed. Users running this class of CPU should use 
FreeBSD 5./X/ or earlier."



Christer Hermansson

It's a lot of names around us, not only in the computer world, that has 
become less suitable during the time because of progress and other 
things, but still is in use because of different factors.


I missed to write in my first mail that I also have the feeling (maybe 
I'm wrong) that "x86" is more recognized / common in the media nowadays.


However in this case maybe it's best to keep "i386" because a lot of 
things depends on this name and it would be a lot of work/problems to 
change it.


This was just one thought I had but it seems to be a bad one.

Best regards Christer Hermansson

--

http://www.chdevelopment.se/

"Be honest and you can demand honesty,
be loyal and you can demand loyalty,
show respect and you can demand respect."


___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


i386 do not support i386

2005-11-23 Thread Christer Hermansson

Hi.

FreeBSD 6.0R don't support 386 processors according to the release 
notes, maybe it's time to change the name of the i386 platform to the 
x86 platform.


Not very important issue for me but it feels little strange to have a 
i386 platform that don't support/work on i386 processors.


http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/relnotes-i386.html#KERNEL
"Support for 80386 processors (the I386_CPU kernel configuration option) 
has been removed. Users running this class of CPU should use FreeBSD 
5./X/ or earlier."



Christer Hermansson

--

http://www.chdevelopment.se/

"Be honest and you can demand honesty,
be loyal and you can demand loyalty,
show respect and you can demand respect."


___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"