Re: The sorry state of open source today

2007-04-20 Thread Radu-Cristian FOTESCU
surprised to see that the most coherent attack (on both me and Jem -- `The sorry state of The Jem Report', remember?) is coming from a FreeBSD developer. FYI, the FreeBSD Foundation has not yet signed off Well, with or without the Flash agreement, 99.999% of the users will find their way. Thanks

Re: The sorry state of open source today

2007-04-20 Thread Radu-Cristian FOTESCU
--- Tom Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What was it that you said then? I actually cannot remember. Page 7: Except for the *BSD family, whose members are either _*_backed_*_ by 501(c)(3) non-profit organizations like The FreeBSD Foundation or the NetBSD Project, or the task of individuals like

The sorry state of open source today

2007-04-19 Thread Radu-Cristian FOTESCU
Really, folks, what makes you so aggressive?! I was hurt, and disappointed. I was having higher expectations from the FreeBSD guys. http://beranger.org/index.php?article=2858 R-C Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo!

Re: The sorry state of open source today

2007-04-19 Thread Matt Olander
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote: Really, folks, what makes you so aggressive?! I was hurt, and disappointed. I was having higher expectations from the FreeBSD guys. http://beranger.org/index.php?article=2858 R-C Hi R-C, You have definitely blogged an interesting piece! I hardly think that

Re: The sorry state of open source today

2007-04-19 Thread Tom Rhodes
a comment that was offensive. And if so, I'm sorry that it was missed; however, you need to understand that you acted like a reporter. You placed yourself in a position as a public figure and in a situation where people might disagree with what you had to say. Not everyone will like it. Not everyone

Re: The sorry state of open source today

2007-04-18 Thread Scott Long
errors regarding FreeBSD. I have posted a rebuttal on my blog: http://maycontaintracesofbolts.blogspot.com/2007/04/sorry-state-of-jem-report.html DES I'll rebut you're rebuttal =-) You're absolutely correct about feature-based vs time-based being a problem. However, KSE was NOT, I REPEAT

Re: The sorry state of open source today

2007-04-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
José Manuel Molina Pascual [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What can be said about a guy that repeats Our friends, the software patents in several chapters. If you think he favors software patents, you need to read the article again - carefully. He does play the devil's advocate early on, but he

Re: The sorry state of open source today

2007-04-18 Thread José Manuel Molina Pascual
Yes, it's true that I've been posting as I was reading, in fact he seems to have good feelings with the *BSD family. Anyway, the chapter bugs in the free is a total nonsense. On 4/18/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: José Manuel Molina Pascual [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What can

Sorry

2005-11-04 Thread ac
I've just received my own postings 2Nicole and 2Joshua Tinnin... and read them. Hm... :( Sorry for my English ___ freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy To unsubscribe, send any mail