> Would it be worth considering to provide the BSD Installer [1] as an
> alternate choice to sysinstall for a default FreeBSD installation?
> I'm sure several people already thought of it and it might be
> interesting to hear their conclusions.
That would be a decision for release engineers on [
i would appreciate a new freebsd loading scheme more than a replacement
loader. the main annoyance to me is the requirement that freebsd be
loaded in a primary partition. i am not familiar with the structure of
the freebsd partition or what necessitates use of a primary partition.
what i would li
james r relyea wrote:
i would appreciate a new freebsd loading scheme more than a replacement
loader. the main annoyance to me is the requirement that freebsd be
loaded in a primary partition. i am not familiar with the structure of
the freebsd partition or what necessitates use of a primary pa
