Was the project going to lose any significant contributors if we didn't
protect them from *hugs*?
Probably not, but I don't think that's the right question to ask. I
think the right question to ask is does the current CoC attract new
people who want to contribute, but are perhaps intimidated
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 09:53:19 -0500
CL Moonriver wrote:
> > Was the project going to lose any significant contributors if we
> > didn't protect them from *hugs*?
> The point is, I think it is important that the CoC make new
> contributors feel welcome and that if they want to contribute,
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:38:21 -0400
Chad Jacob Milios wrote:
> > On Jul 17, 2018, at 5:23 AM, Erich Dollansky
> > wrote:
> >
> > you mean, the money spent on the CoC would not helped to develop
> > better code by getting people willing to code for the same amount
> > of money.
>
> Now I
My question was a direct response to another comment, which said the new
CoC did not chase away any significant contributors.
Do we want to attract people with no useful skills? I think that,
regardless of whether you are "Vulnerable" or "Oppressor", your work
should have to be good enough to be
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 12:10:47 -0400
Stephen Cook wrote:
> Was the project going to lose any significant contributors if we
> didn't protect them from *hugs*?
I would not have expected.
>
> against spurious accusations. It would also be a violation to "dox"
> someone, which the FreeBSD CoC
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 19:44:55 -0400
Chad Jacob Milios wrote:
> > On Jul 13, 2018, at 6:44 PM, Erich Dollansky
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > here are the consequences of putting a CoC up high on the priority
> > list:
> >
> >
