CC severely trimmed
2008/11/3 Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Its a voluntary reporting ... I know with both PC-BSD, reporting is on by
> default .. with FreeBSD, its a simple 'make install' in ports ... with
> NetBSD/OpenBSD, I suspect its purely manual, so a bit more work involved ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Its a voluntary reporting ... I know with both PC-BSD, reporting is on by
default .. with FreeBSD, its a simple 'make install' in ports ... with
NetBSD/OpenBSD, I suspect its purely manual, so a bit more work involved ...
Both NetBSD / OpenBSD #s h
Quoting Don Witt, who wrote on Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:12:46PM -0800 ..
> This is very cool. What is up with NetBSD and OpenBSD. Are these numbers
> accurate?
They are not not at all accurate. What is being measured for FreeBSD e.g. is
the willingness
of people to do
For FreeBSD users, yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Monday, November 03, 2008 16:01:41 -1000 Al Plant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Aloha,
>
> I have 10 FreeBSD servers and desktops in use here in Hawaii.
>
> These are not on the list as I only have 4 servers that are up 24/7 and they
> are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, November 04, 2008 01:10:02 +0100 Bernt Hansson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier skrev:
>> As of November 3rd, 2008, the project has hit a new milestone of 25 000+
>> hosts reporting in, with a break down as follows:
>
> [BCCed others]
>
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Don Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> This is very cool. What is up with NetBSD and OpenBSD. Are these
>> numbers
>> accurate?
>
> These numbers represent the number of people that have installed a
> program to report usage, and are almost
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Tim Clewlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or count the number of systems that call home, ie count the number
> of different IP addresses that talk to the *BSD servers to install
> or update themselves.
Yes, Colin has aggregate numbers from freebsd-update users. You
Those are only boxes that "report in" -- as it says, PC-BSD is the only one
that automatically reports. The rest don't by default. That means that those
figures are not really accurate for overall usage, except for PC-BSD.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Don Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thi
[BCCed others]
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Don Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is very cool. What is up with NetBSD and OpenBSD. Are these numbers
> accurate?
These numbers represent the number of people that have installed a
program to report usage, and are almost completely uncorre
This is very cool. What is up with NetBSD and OpenBSD. Are these numbers
accurate?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org;
[EMAIL PROTEC
10 matches
Mail list logo