Re: Bind within src-contrib

2005-10-13 Thread Kevin Kinsey
This looks and sounds like a question, so I've changed the cc: appropriately... if you reply, make sure and remove "advocacy" in the event it appears Frank Laszlo wrote: Joshua Bell wrote: Hi, I was attempting to build a minimal supfile, when I noticed that bind was included within co

Re: Bind within src-contrib

2005-10-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Joshua Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was attempting to build a minimal supfile, when I noticed that > bind was included within contrib. This to me seems like something > that should be included within the ports tree, or atleast be > included in a portion of the tree with less crucial softwa

Re: Bind within src-contrib

2005-10-12 Thread Frank Laszlo
Johnson David wrote: From: Frank Laszlo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] How would you like a system with no host(1), dig(1), or nslookup(1)? I personally consider these tools essential for a freebsd system. Are these utilities used anywhere else in FreeBSD, such as the startup scripts? Ar

Re: Bind within src-contrib

2005-10-12 Thread Johnson David
From: Frank Laszlo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > How would you like a system with no host(1), dig(1), or nslookup(1)? I > personally consider these tools essential for a freebsd system. Are these utilities used anywhere else in FreeBSD, such as the startup scripts? Are they something required by t

Re: Bind within src-contrib

2005-10-12 Thread Frank Laszlo
Joshua Bell wrote: Hi, I was attempting to build a minimal supfile, when I noticed that bind was included within contrib. This to me seems like something that should be included within the ports tree, or atleast be included in a portion of the tree with less crucial software. I persona