On 22 Jun 2005, at 21:11, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
AG> On 21 Jun 2005, at 01:38, Bob Martin wrote:
IMHO, if they can roll out a patch to a major security flaw in a
day, they should have been able to fix the uptime clock at some
point in the last decade. Odd that MS can do something that Linux
can'
On 21 Jun 2005, at 01:38, Bob Martin wrote:
IMHO, if they can roll out a patch to a major security flaw in a
day, they should have been able to fix the uptime clock at some
point in the last decade. Odd that MS can do something that Linux
can't.
This was fixed about 3 years ago.
-Andy
___
Linux uptimes roll over at 400 days, so the comment was to off set the
whining.
IMHO, if they can roll out a patch to a major security flaw in a day,
they should have been able to fix the uptime clock at some point in the
last decade. Odd that MS can do something that Linux can't.
Bob Martin
From: Andrew L. Gould [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> For those of you who haven't seen it, FreeBSD has an entry
> in Wikipedia:
The Netcraft sentence is quite strange. Instead of just saying FreeBSD has
the longest uptime at Netcraft, it's prefixed with "of the operating systems
that accurately re
