>Number: 148805
>Category: amd64
>Synopsis: FreeBSD 7.2, 8.0, and 9.0 hang during install at probing
>devices
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: high
>Responsible:freebsd-amd64
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Requi
On 07/20/10 08:07, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, July 19, 2010 5:30:54 pm Kostik Belousov wrote:
Hi,
I intend to commit the following change, that makes sysctls
hw.machine_arch and hw.machine to return "i386" for 32 bit
binaries run on amd64. In particular, 32 bit uname -m and uname -p
prin
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:07 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, July 19, 2010 5:30:54 pm Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I intend to commit the following change, that makes sysctls
>> hw.machine_arch and hw.machine to return "i386" for 32 bit
>> binaries run on amd64. In particular, 32 bit unam
On Tuesday, July 20, 2010 1:51:27 pm Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:07 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Monday, July 19, 2010 5:30:54 pm Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I intend to commit the following change, that makes sysctls
> >> hw.machine_arch and hw.machine to return "
On Monday, July 19, 2010 5:30:54 pm Kostik Belousov wrote:
> Hi,
> I intend to commit the following change, that makes sysctls
> hw.machine_arch and hw.machine to return "i386" for 32 bit
> binaries run on amd64. In particular, 32 bit uname -m and uname -p
> print "i386", that is good for i386 jail
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 04:17:16PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> Just checked, and I was a little off. We don't actually do this in the
> kernel, we override it in the environment UNAME_ variables. All of our
> software that wants to look at the machine arch uses uname to do it,
> so we go that route.
Kostik Belousov writes:
> I intend to commit the following change, that makes sysctls
> hw.machine_arch and hw.machine to return "i386" for 32 bit
> binaries run on amd64. In particular, 32 bit uname -m and uname -p
> print "i386", that is good for i386 jails on amd64 kernels.
*thank you*, this t
