[Bug 211864] Compiler is using AVX instructions for CPUTYPE=btver1

2016-08-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
eds-qa CC|freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org |r...@freebsd.org Summary|[Regression] Compiler is|Compiler is using AVX |using AVX instructions for |instructions for |CPUTYPE=btver1 |CPUTYPE=btver1 Stat

[Bug 211864] [Regression] Compiler is using AVX instructions for CPUTYPE=btver1

2016-08-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211864 Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Compiler is using AVX |[Regr

[Bug 211864] Compiler is using AVX instructions for CPUTYPE=btver1

2016-08-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211864 Bug ID: 211864 Summary: Compiler is using AVX instructions for CPUTYPE=btver1 Product: Base System Version: 11.0-RC1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Any Status: New

Re: AVX

2012-01-10 Thread Yamagi Burmeister
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:22:14 +0200 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote: CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T6670 @ 2.20GHz (2194.55-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x1067a Family = 6 Model = 17 Stepping = 10

Re: AVX

2012-01-09 Thread Yamagi Burmeister
First, thank you for working on AVX, it's much appreciated. On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 21:59:13 +0200 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote: CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T6670 @ 2.20GHz (2194.55-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x1067a Family = 6 Model = 17 Stepping

Re: AVX

2012-01-09 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 10:37:47AM +0100, Yamagi Burmeister wrote: First, thank you for working on AVX, it's much appreciated. On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 21:59:13 +0200 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote: CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T6670 @ 2.20GHz (2194.55-MHz K8-class CPU

Re: AVX

2012-01-08 Thread Yamagi Burmeister
Hi, I've tested your patch on a Core2Duo with XSAVE but (of course) without AVX on 10-CURRENT as of today (r229812): CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T6670 @ 2.20GHz (2194.55-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x1067a Family = 6 Model = 17 Stepping = 10 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU

Re: AVX

2012-01-08 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 05:41:12PM +0100, Yamagi Burmeister wrote: Hi, I've tested your patch on a Core2Duo with XSAVE but (of course) without AVX on 10-CURRENT as of today (r229812): CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T6670 @ 2.20GHz (2194.55-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id

Re: AVX

2012-01-01 Thread Kostik Belousov
The patch http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/avx.2.patch is the commit candidate. Compared with avx.1.patch, it includes several bugfixes, some move of code around, and finishes the implementation of getcontextx(3) for non-x86 architectures. Please note that variant of getcontextx() is required

AVX

2011-12-26 Thread Kostik Belousov
Hello, The patch at http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/avx.1.patch is the preliminary version, i.e. WIP, of the implementation of variable-sized extended FPU states, as defined by Intel SDM. The architecture (sometimes referred to as XSAVE) allows CPU to provide additional context state data

[PATCH] Add support for AVX

2011-03-11 Thread Tim Bird
Hello all, I am representing a group in Sony that wishes to submit the patch below to add the described feature to AVX. I know this is somewhat unconventional, but I am not the original author of the patch, nor do I have a build or run environment for BSD. However, I have been asked