[Bug 225944] ipfw table destruction exit code and -q option

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225944 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org

[Bug 225946] /usr/bin/make dumps core with simple Makefile

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225946 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|/usr/bin/make |/usr/bin/make

[Bug 225946] /usr/bin/make

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225946 Bug ID: 225946 Summary: /usr/bin/make Product: Base System Version: CURRENT Hardware: amd64 OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People

[Bug 225944] ipfw table destruction exit code and -q option

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225944 Bug ID: 225944 Summary: ipfw table destruction exit code and -q option Product: Base System Version: 11.1-STABLE Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New

[Bug 203366] kevent: EV_CLEAR on fifo does not work correctly

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203366 --- Comment #10 from Jan Kokemüller --- So the EV_EOF flag is 'sticky' in kn_flags and does not get cleared anywhere, right? Then I was wrong in comment #7. There is also bug #224615 for an interesting edgecase

[Bug 200079] [patch] Canada Uses ISO 8601 for Dates

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200079 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 225182] devel/powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc: SLOF Data Storage Exception on boot with kernel built with devel/powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225182 --- Comment #13 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Kenneth Salerno from comment #12) For the explicit record for head: -r328835 was also required to avoid the heap and kernel from overlapping. The large MFC

[Bug 225182] devel/powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc: SLOF Data Storage Exception on boot with kernel built with devel/powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225182 --- Comment #12 from Kenneth Salerno --- (In reply to Breno Leitao from comment #11) Awesome, took a look at the patch (increase heap space from 64k to 512k) and this definitely looks promising. Will test as soon

[Bug 225933] Read-only sysctl variable "kern.ipc.shmsegs" does not return number of segments

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225933 Brooks Davis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |In Progress

[Bug 222671] tail(1): tail -r fails on certain piped input

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222671 Bryan Drewery changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 225934] FIFOs lack kevent EVFILT_VNODE support

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225934 Bug ID: 225934 Summary: FIFOs lack kevent EVFILT_VNODE support Product: Base System Version: CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity:

[Bug 225933] Read-only sysctl variable "kern.ipc.shmsegs" does not return number of segments

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225933 Bug ID: 225933 Summary: Read-only sysctl variable "kern.ipc.shmsegs" does not return number of segments Product: Base System Version: 11.1-RELEASE Hardware: Any

[Bug 225932] uplcom Prolific PL2302 doesn't support high baud rates

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225932 Gabor Simon changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #190667|text/x-c++src |text/plain

[Bug 225932] uplcom Prolific PL2302 doesn't support high baud rates

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225932 Gabor Simon changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #190666|text/x-csrc |text/plain

[Bug 225932] uplcom Prolific PL2302 doesn't support high baud rates

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225932 Bug ID: 225932 Summary: uplcom Prolific PL2302 doesn't support high baud rates Product: Base System Version: 11.1-RELEASE Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New

[Bug 194204] getentropy(2): sys call from openbsd

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194204 --- Comment #11 from Mateusz Guzik --- > I think that's the wrong way to look at it; if we have a weak CSPRNG that > needs to be fixed, regardless of the mechanism by which userland obtains > entropy from kernel. The

[Bug 203366] kevent: EV_CLEAR on fifo does not work correctly

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203366 --- Comment #9 from Bryan Drewery --- r232055 dropped the fifo filter: -static int -filt_fiforead(struct knote *kn, long hint) -{ - struct socket *so = (struct socket *)kn->kn_hook; - -

[Bug 225918] msk: excessive latency on arm64

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225918 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug 194204] getentropy(2): sys call from openbsd

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194204 --- Comment #10 from Conrad Meyer --- Btw, our kernel random has used chacha20 since 2017 -- r317015. I realize comment #5 dates from 2014, though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Bug 57045] trpt(8) option -t was disabled on -current

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57045 Conrad Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@freebsd.org

[Bug 194204] getentropy(2): sys call from openbsd

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194204 Conrad Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@freebsd.org

trpt(8) bug with patch attached

Hi, Can anyone have a look at this PR? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57045 It basically removes from the man a program option no longer present in the code. Cheers. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list

[Bug 225927] [panic] NULL pointer dereference in nd6_llinfo_timer()

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225927 Andrey V. Elsukov changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 --- Comment #6 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 190657 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=190657=edit seq output from FreeBSD current seq output generated in FreeBSD current with patches

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 --- Comment #7 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 190658 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=190658=edit seq output generator generator of different seq executions. -- You are receiving this

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 --- Comment #5 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 190656 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=190656=edit seq output from ubuntu Output generated in an Ubuntu system -- You are receiving this

[Bug 225927] [panic] NULL pointer dereference in nd6_llinfo_timer()

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225927 Bug ID: 225927 Summary: [panic] NULL pointer dereference in nd6_llinfo_timer() Product: Base System Version: CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New

[Bug 225923] ZFS lock order reversal in vfs_subr.c:2157 vfs_subr.c:2607

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225923 Andriy Gapon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Closed

[Bug 225923] ZFS lock order reversal in vfs_subr.c:2157 vfs_subr.c:2607

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225923 --- Comment #1 from vidwer+fbsdb...@gmail.com --- zpool version: 5000 Bug #128633 or #142878 or #210906 don't seem to match, when looking at the reported line numbers or OS versions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 225923] ZFS lock order reversal in vfs_subr.c:2157 vfs_subr.c:2607

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225923 Bug ID: 225923 Summary: ZFS lock order reversal in vfs_subr.c:2157 vfs_subr.c:2607 Product: Base System Version: CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any

[Bug 225918] msk: excessive latency on arm64

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225918 Bug ID: 225918 Summary: msk: excessive latency on arm64 Product: Base System Version: CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects

[Bug 225911] [asmc] [patch] Add support for mid-2011 Macmini 5,2

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225911 Bug ID: 225911 Summary: [asmc] [patch] Add support for mid-2011 Macmini 5,2 Product: Base System Version: 11.1-STABLE Hardware: amd64 OS: Any Status: New