Re: kern/181439: [headers] sys/wait.h is not enough to use waitid(), but kind of should be.

2013-11-16 Thread jilles
Synopsis: [headers] sys/wait.h is not enough to use waitid(), but kind of should be. State-Changed-From-To: open-analyzed State-Changed-By: jilles State-Changed-When: Sat Nov 16 11:25:20 UTC 2013 State-Changed-Why: This should be referred to the Austin group, since the specified behaviour seems

Re: kern/181439: [headers] sys/wait.h is not enough to use waitid(), but kind of should be.

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: In PR kern/181439, you wrote: [sys/wait.h does not define siginfo_t] POSIX says that sys/wait.h shall define siginfo_t and may make visible all symbols from signal.h. This was even in the 2001 version (under an XSI extension) (waitid was there

Re: kern/181439: [headers] sys/wait.h is not enough to use waitid(), but kind of should be.

2013-08-21 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
The following reply was made to PR kern/181439; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jilles Tjoelker jil...@stack.nl To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, x...@debian.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/181439: [headers] sys/wait.h is not enough to use waitid(), but kind of should be. Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013