https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207359
--- Comment #4 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to Mark Millard from comment #3)
And now I see that I types "libc++" in places that I should have typed
"libcxxrt".
Noted here just to help avoid confusions.
--
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207359
--- Comment #3 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to Mark Millard from comment #2)
I should have noted that powerpc64-gcc was used for buildworld of
projects/clang380-import -r295902 (and other versions) --and so for
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207359
--- Comment #2 from Mark Millard ---
I've finally traced the low level details of the _Unwind_RaiseException stuck
looping failure. . .
Starting from the observed low-level evidence based on observation via gdb and
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207463
Kristof Provost changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207464
--- Comment #1 from dustinw...@ebureau.com ---
This is almost a stock kernel, with vimage enabled and the ARC patch applied
from https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187594
I see that the checkin yesterday for vfs_subr.c
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207464
Bug ID: 207464
Summary: Panic when destroying ZFS snapshot on boot filesystem
Product: Base System
Version: 10.2-STABLE
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207463
Bug ID: 207463
Summary: [patch]
stable/10/sys/netpfil/pf/pf_ioctl.c:pfioctl(DIOCRSETAD
DRS) buffer overflow
Product: Base System
Version: 10.3-BETA2
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207069
Ian Lepore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204081
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-patch,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194925
--- Comment #8 from Mark Felder ---
The problem I fixed was that "groups" were hidden from ifconfig(8) output.
The outstanding issue is that when pf was ported to FreeBSD we never made
automatic group membership work. As
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194925
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||mfc-stable10?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194925
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207459
Andrey V. Elsukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207459
--- Comment #3 from Andrey V. Elsukov ---
(In reply to smithi from comment #2)
> Rats, ae@ beat me to it .. i << 32 is of course 0.
>
> But not just sbin/ipfw .. also in /sys/netpfil/ipfw/ip_fw2.c:
Yes, you are right.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194925
Mark Felder changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207459
smi...@nimnet.asn.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||smi...@nimnet.asn.au
---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207459
Andrey V. Elsukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207459
Sean changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Many People
--
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207459
Bug ID: 207459
Summary: ipfw rule using dscp cs4 results in be/cs0
Product: Base System
Version: 10.2-RELEASE
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207422
--- Comment #1 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: kib
Date: Wed Feb 24 11:58:15 UTC 2016
New revision: 295966
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/295966
Log:
Return dst as the result from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207457
Bug ID: 207457
Summary: pgrep OR libkvm - cannot get process list (Bad
address)
Product: Base System
Version: 9.3-STABLE
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202140
--- Comment #3 from Jochen Breuer ---
Hi Ivan, changing the timer solves the problem. But if those timers can't be
used with C8, perhaps they shouldn't be the default in the first place.
--
You are receiving this mail
22 matches
Mail list logo