[Bug 239894] security.bsd.stack_guard_page default causes Java to crash

2019-08-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239894 --- Comment #11 from Kurt Miller --- (In reply to Kurt Miller from comment #10) Sorry, typo in previous comment. It should have read "...setting security.bsd.stack_guard_page to 513 will cause all future pthread_create(2) calls to

[Bug 239894] security.bsd.stack_guard_page default causes Java to crash

2019-08-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239894 --- Comment #10 from Kurt Miller --- (In reply to Konstantin Belousov from comment #8) Thank you for writing this. However, it doesn't address the interaction between kernel placed guard pages and pthreads. Consider for example setting

[Bug 240023] netmap lb pointer out of bounds on ixgbe

2019-08-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240023 --- Comment #2 from mike ---

[Bug 240023] netmap lb pointer out of bounds on ixgbe

2019-08-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240023 --- Comment #1 from mike --- Output of lb. Packets increment fine until bro-netmap attaches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___

[Bug 240018] remove reference to terminfo(5) from tput man page

2019-08-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240018 Bug ID: 240018 Summary: remove reference to terminfo(5) from tput man page Product: Documentation Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New

[Bug 240023] netmap lb pointer out of bounds on ixgbe

2019-08-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240023 Bug ID: 240023 Summary: netmap lb pointer out of bounds on ixgbe Product: Base System Version: 11.3-RELEASE Hardware: amd64 OS: Any Status: New

[Bug 240015] kevent example to check event.flags is wrong.

2019-08-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240015 Bug ID: 240015 Summary: kevent example to check event.flags is wrong. Product: Documentation Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New

[Bug 239982] IPv6 network stack panics since upgrading to 11.3

2019-08-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239982 --- Comment #2 from j.david.li...@gmail.com --- Retesting with the FreeBSD-SA-19:22.mbuf fix released yesterday, which seems highly likely to be related. Will update if the problem reoccurs. (Shouldn't take long.) Have set a note to

[Bug 239894] security.bsd.stack_guard_page default causes Java to crash

2019-08-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239894 --- Comment #7 from Konstantin Belousov --- (In reply to Greg Lewis from comment #6) First, I am not sure what you mean by 'ther reasons a SIGSEGV could occur in the normal stack region (e.g. a buffer overflow)'. If the region is mapped

[Bug 240015] kqueue(2) manual example code is a bit wrong.

2019-08-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240015 Yoshisato Yanagisawa changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|kevent example to check |kqueue(2) manual example

[Bug 239894] security.bsd.stack_guard_page default causes Java to crash

2019-08-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239894 --- Comment #8 from Konstantin Belousov --- I also wrote the promised procctl(PROC_STACKGAP_CTL), see https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21352. But I do not think that it would alone help with the JVM use of guards. It might be needed in

[Bug 239894] security.bsd.stack_guard_page default causes Java to crash

2019-08-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239894 --- Comment #9 from Kurt Miller --- (In reply to Konstantin Belousov from comment #7) Answering your questions: Attempting execute code on the stack I believe with raise a SIGSEGV. The JVM uses pthread stacks. Currently the jvm does an

[Bug 239721] Add RFC for mountd(8) manual page

2019-08-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239721 --- Comment #3 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: markj Date: Wed Aug 21 16:16:17 UTC 2019 New revision: 351336 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/351336 Log: MFC r350780: Add a

[Bug 239726] Fix iscontrol(8) man page

2019-08-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239726 --- Comment #3 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: markj Date: Wed Aug 21 16:15:40 UTC 2019 New revision: 351335 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/351335 Log: MFC r350779: Fix

[Bug 239722] du(1) man page enhancement (new standards and authors section)

2019-08-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239722 --- Comment #3 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: markj Date: Wed Aug 21 16:17:23 UTC 2019 New revision: 351338 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/351338 Log: MFC r350782: Flesh out the

[Bug 239720] Update for whois(1) man page (Standards Section)

2019-08-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239720 --- Comment #3 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: markj Date: Wed Aug 21 16:16:53 UTC 2019 New revision: 351337 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/351337 Log: MFC r350781: Update RFC