[Bug 230720] strptime() conversion and validation issues
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230720 --- Comment #3 from rlit...@inetco.com --- Many thanks, Yuri. Ralph -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 221777] merge the latest changes to the ig4 module from DragonFly BSD and add Kaby Lake / Intel 100 series platform support
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221777 Neel Chauhan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@neelc.org --- Comment #28 from Neel Chauhan --- I have tried this on a HP EliteBook 1040 G3 and while the touchpad was detected, I could not move the cursor. psm works on the 1040 G3 as an Alps GlidePoint (the 1040 G3 uses the Alps T4 chip) but I cannot do things like two finger scroll. The T4 chip supports HID over I2C and I think this is a better place to support the T4 than psm (keep in mind that I am no expert on pointing devices or the FreeBSD kernel). dmesg reports this: acpi_iichid0: on acpi0 acpi_iichid0: descriptor register address is 20 acpi_iichid0: unexpected type 17 while parsing Current Resource Settings (_CSR) acpi_iichid0: parent device is "\134_SB_.PCI0.I2C1" iichid0: at addr 0x20 on iicbus1 iichid0: ADDR 0x20 REG 0x20 iichid0: 3 buttons and [XYZ] coordinates ID=6 iichid0: 3 buttons and [XYZ] coordinates ID=6 acpi_iichid0: added iichid0 ADDR 0x20 REG 0x20 to iicbus1 acpi_iichid0: could not allocate IRQ resource The last line seems interesting. If I start moused and point at /dev/ims0, I get this error: moused: unable to get status of mouse fd: Inappropriate ioctl for device And am unable to move the cursor. However, /dev/ims0 does exist. A Linux patch for Alps T4 is here: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=73196ebe134d11a68a2e27814c489d685cfc8b03 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 30321] [patch] strftime(3) '%s' format does not work properly
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30321 Yuri Pankov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yur...@yuripv.net --- Comment #5 from Yuri Pankov --- (17 years later) this behavior now looks like being there forever, and glibc agrees, likely we can close this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 192016] Incorrect result for %s in strftime
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192016 Yuri Pankov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yur...@yuripv.net --- Comment #1 from Yuri Pankov --- It's hard to say if it's a bug in FreeBSD libc and glibc or if it's a bug in musl as %s is NOT specified by POSIX. See bug #30321 for more details. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 230720] strptime() conversion and validation issues
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230720 Yuri Pankov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yur...@yuripv.net --- Comment #2 from Yuri Pankov --- "00","%d" is fixed in base r339241 (bug #232072) "00","%I" and "00","%l" are fixed in base r339346. I'll take care of the remaining issues reported here, and sorry for missing this initially. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 231882] multiple toolchain issues with statically linked binaries
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231882 Bug 231882 depends on bug 232176, which changed state. Bug 232176 Summary: elftoolchain elfcopy/strip incorrectly strips relocations https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232176 What|Removed |Added Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 232176] elftoolchain elfcopy/strip incorrectly strips relocations
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232176 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 232176] elftoolchain elfcopy/strip incorrectly strips relocations
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232176 --- Comment #4 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: emaste Date: Sat Oct 13 21:26:07 UTC 2018 New revision: 339350 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/339350 Log: elfcopy: delete filter_reloc, it is broken and unnecessary elfcopy contained logic to filter individual relocations in STRIP_ALL mode. However, this is not valid; relocations emitted by the linker are required, unless they apply to an entire section being removed (which is handled by other logic in elfcopy). Note that filter_reloc was also buggy: for RELA relocation sections it operated on uninitialized rel.r_info resulting in invalid operation. The logic most likely needs to be inverted: instead of removing relocations because their associated symbols are being removed, we must keep symbols referenced by relocations. That said, in practice we do not encounter this code path today: objects being stripped are either dynamically linked binaries which retain .dynsym, or static binaries with no relocations. Just remove filter_reloc. This fixes certain cases including statically linked binaries containing ifuncs. Stripping binaries with relocations referencing removed symbols was already broken, and after this change may still be broken in a different way. PR: 232176 Reviewed by: kaiw, kib, markj Approved by: re (rgrimes) MFC after:1 month Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision:https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17519 Changes: head/contrib/elftoolchain/elfcopy/sections.c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 229830] [truss] throws an assertion failure after the trussed process got killed
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229830 --- Comment #4 from Jan Kokemüller --- Sorry, I forgot to mention that I'm running FreeBSD 12.0-ALPHA9 amd64 with some local patches: FreeBSD 12.0-ALPHA9 FreeBSD 12.0-ALPHA9 #3 r339331+0547250df758(test-suspend48)-dirty: Sat Oct 13 13:47:25 CEST 2018 With the program I posted it is reproducible ~80-90% of the time on my laptop. I've found that adding a "usleep(5);" between the pthread_create() and kill() increases this number. This makes sure that "truss -H" gets the new thread notification (like "101702: "). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 232210] sendfile(2) doesn't percolate up issues with copyout(9) related to sbytes
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232210 Gleb Smirnoff changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|gleb...@freebsd.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 232210] sendfile(2) doesn't percolate up issues with copyout(9) related to sbytes
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232210 Gleb Smirnoff changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |In Progress --- Comment #2 from Gleb Smirnoff --- That's a good catch, but I don't fully agree on the patch. Some return values of sendfile aren't errors, and the patch doesn't cover them. If sendfile returns EAGAIN, which is normal for non-blocking socket, we again ignore copyout error. I think we should take in copyout error always. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 178664] truss(1) may kill process
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178664 Alan Somers changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asom...@freebsd.org --- Comment #5 from Alan Somers --- Can we close this, Jilles? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 229830] [truss] throws an assertion failure after the trussed process got killed
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229830 Alan Somers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Open --- Comment #3 from Alan Somers --- I can reproduce this on 11.2-RELEASE and TrueOS-Desktop-201803131015, but not 12.0-ALPHA9. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Classic Gear Priced to Sell
[[HEADLINE]] [[PERMALINK_FULL_LINK]] TITLE OF YOUR EMAIL The content of your email goes here. You can drag and drop blocks of text, images or other content elements to add them to your message. Customize the font and the colors. Add links to track clicks. This is a second paragraph you can customize as your please. If you have stored contact properties with your contacts, you can include personalization variables such as first name, last name in your message content. [[DELIVERY_INFO]] [[POSTAL_ADDRESS]] ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 229830] [truss] throws an assertion failure after the trussed process got killed
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229830
Jan Kokemüller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.kokemuel...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Jan Kokemüller ---
This bug can be reproduced by truss'ing this process:
#include
#include
#include
#include
void *thread_fun(void *arg) {
(void)arg;
sleep(5);
return NULL;
}
int main() {
pthread_t thread;
if (pthread_create(, NULL, thread_fun, NULL) != 0) {
return 1;
}
kill(getpid(), SIGKILL);
sleep(1);
}
I suspect the reason is that threads killed by "thread_single()" in "exit1()"
don't send a ptrace notification.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
