[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-02-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 Conrad Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-02-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 --- Comment #18 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #17) Yes, that's where I got the idea from after playing (unsuccessfully) with the numbers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-02-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 --- Comment #17 from Conrad Meyer --- Ok, GNU seq basically takes the same approach as your comment #4 patch. So I've come around to that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-02-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 --- Comment #16 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #15) I tried to pre-calculate the number of steps and iterate regardless of the cur<=last condition but it doesn't work either. I can't see how

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-02-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 --- Comment #15 from Conrad Meyer --- (In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #14) Hm, no, that's still wrong. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-02-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 --- Comment #14 from Conrad Meyer --- (In reply to fernando.apesteguia from comment #12) > cur >= last - (incr / 2); This one should also be plus. > The problem with this one is that in some cases, we are not stopping

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-02-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 --- Comment #13 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 190999 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=190999=edit seq output for new approach with cur <= last + (incr / 2) -- You are receiving this

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-02-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 --- Comment #12 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #11) OK, this is the new approach: Index: seq.c === --- seq.c (revisiĆ³n:

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-02-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 --- Comment #11 from Conrad Meyer --- (In reply to fernando.apesteguia from comment #10) > Do you mean something like this? Oh, sorry, I meant (incr/2) not (step/2). And also for the negative incr case, of course. But

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-02-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 --- Comment #10 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #9) Do you mean something like this? Index: seq.c === --- seq.c (revisiĆ³n:

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-02-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 Conrad Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@freebsd.org

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-02-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 --- Comment #6 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 190657 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=190657=edit seq output from FreeBSD current seq output generated in FreeBSD current with patches

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-02-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 --- Comment #7 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 190658 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=190658=edit seq output generator generator of different seq executions. -- You are receiving this

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-02-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 --- Comment #5 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 190656 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=190656=edit seq output from ubuntu Output generated in an Ubuntu system -- You are receiving this

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-02-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch -- You

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-02-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-01-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 Jilles Tjoelker changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-01-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 Yuri Pankov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #189755|0 |1 is

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2018-01-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 Yuri Pankov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yur...@icloud.com

[Bug 217149] seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment

2017-02-16 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149 Bug ID: 217149 Summary: seq(1) inconsistently omits 'last' when using float increment Product: Base System Version: 11.0-STABLE Hardware: Any OS: Any