https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225911
Bug ID: 225911
Summary: [asmc] [patch] Add support for mid-2011 Macmini 5,2
Product: Base System
Version: 11.1-STABLE
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225918
Bug ID: 225918
Summary: msk: excessive latency on arm64
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects On
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225923
Bug ID: 225923
Summary: ZFS lock order reversal in vfs_subr.c:2157
vfs_subr.c:2607
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225923
--- Comment #1 from vidwer+fbsdb...@gmail.com ---
zpool version: 5000
Bug #128633 or #142878 or #210906 don't seem to match, when looking at the
reported line numbers or OS versions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the ass
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225923
Andriy Gapon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225927
Bug ID: 225927
Summary: [panic] NULL pointer dereference in nd6_llinfo_timer()
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149
--- Comment #5 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 190656
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=190656&action=edit
seq output from ubuntu
Output generated in an Ubuntu system
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149
--- Comment #7 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 190658
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=190658&action=edit
seq output generator
generator of different seq executions.
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149
--- Comment #6 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 190657
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=190657&action=edit
seq output from FreeBSD current
seq output generated in FreeBSD current with patche
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225927
Andrey V. Elsukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org|freebsd-...@freebsd.org
--
Yo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217149
--- Comment #8 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com ---
With the last patch we generate the same output as in Ubuntu with seq from
CoreUtils 8.25
The main difference is that we don't add irrelevant zeros to the right as in 2
vs 2.0
--
You a
Hi,
Can anyone have a look at this PR?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57045
It basically removes from the man a program option no longer present
in the code.
Cheers.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.or
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194204
Conrad Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #9 fro
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57045
Conrad Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@freebsd.org
Assignee|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194204
--- Comment #10 from Conrad Meyer ---
Btw, our kernel random has used chacha20 since 2017 -- r317015. I realize
comment #5 dates from 2014, though.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225918
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203366
--- Comment #9 from Bryan Drewery ---
r232055 dropped the fifo filter:
-static int
-filt_fiforead(struct knote *kn, long hint)
-{
- struct socket *so = (struct socket *)kn->kn_hook;
-
- SOCKBUF_LOCK_ASSERT(&so->so_rcv);
-
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194204
--- Comment #11 from Mateusz Guzik ---
> I think that's the wrong way to look at it; if we have a weak CSPRNG that
> needs to be fixed, regardless of the mechanism by which userland obtains
> entropy from kernel.
The way of looking at it
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225932
Bug ID: 225932
Summary: uplcom Prolific PL2302 doesn't support high baud rates
Product: Base System
Version: 11.1-RELEASE
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225932
Gabor Simon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #190666|text/x-csrc |text/plain
mime type|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225932
Gabor Simon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #190667|text/x-c++src |text/plain
mime type|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225933
Bug ID: 225933
Summary: Read-only sysctl variable "kern.ipc.shmsegs" does not
return number of segments
Product: Base System
Version: 11.1-RELEASE
Hardware: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225934
Bug ID: 225934
Summary: FIFOs lack kevent EVFILT_VNODE support
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Aff
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222671
Bryan Drewery changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225933
Brooks Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |In Progress
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225182
--- Comment #12 from Kenneth Salerno ---
(In reply to Breno Leitao from comment #11)
Awesome, took a look at the patch (increase heap space from 64k to 512k) and
this definitely looks promising.
Will test as soon as I get a chance next wee
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225182
--- Comment #13 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to Kenneth Salerno from comment #12)
For the explicit record for head: -r328835
was also required to avoid the heap and kernel
from overlapping.
The large MFC (stable/11 -r329183 ) includes
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200079
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203366
--- Comment #10 from Jan Kokemüller ---
So the EV_EOF flag is 'sticky' in kn_flags and does not get cleared anywhere,
right? Then I was wrong in comment #7.
There is also bug #224615 for an interesting edgecase at FIFO EOF where kevent
and
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225944
Bug ID: 225944
Summary: ipfw table destruction exit code and -q option
Product: Base System
Version: 11.1-STABLE
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
K
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225946
Bug ID: 225946
Summary: /usr/bin/make
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Some People
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225946
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|/usr/bin/make |/usr/bin/make dumps core
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225944
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org|freebsd-i...@freebsd.org
--
You ar
33 matches
Mail list logo
