https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192928
SolarCatcher solarcatc...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
You are receiving this mail as a port that you maintain
is failing to build on the FreeBSD package build server.
Please investigate the failure and submit a PR to fix
build.
Maintainer: chrom...@freebsd.org
Last committer: r...@freebsd.org
Ident: $FreeBSD: head/www/chromium/Makefile
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192928
Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina c...@fbsd.es changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-ports@freebsd.org/msg59085.html
Seems related to debug indeed, it did take a very long time to link chrome
and all my memory and some good amount of swap, but I expected that since
it with debug on!
I'll have to do it with debug off then :(
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:24:59 +0100
Miguel Clara miguelmcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina c...@fbsd.es
wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 23:49:35 +0100
Miguel Clara miguelmcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the info but I get the same result (I
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193101
John Marino mar...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Triage|Open
Hi,
What is the rationale for using external ports instead of bundled
versions? I understand that for example, the bundled OpenSSL has a
number of Google patches. I'd rather have a Chromium with less bugs
than save a little disk space.
Marcus
___
