Re: [PATCH] libc_r bug: successful close(2) sets errno to ENOTTY

2003-11-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Stefan Farfeleder wrote: On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 07:05:02PM +0100, boyd, rounin wrote: From: Jacques A. Vidrine [EMAIL PROTECTED] The application is broken. You must only check errno if you get an error indication from the library call. errno is only meaningful after a syscall error.

Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

2003-11-25 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:07:55PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: What about the newer version of gcc? That is considerably slower than previous versions, but I don't see people screaming to have it removed. Uh... you must not know what you are talking about. GCC *COMPILES* slower as it does a

Re: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked

2003-11-25 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 03:48:57PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: ... I think [/rescue] only needs to support those recovery actions necessary to repair /bin and /sbin if they break. My stance is that no failure mode needs to be repairable that wasn't repairable with a static /. I'm willing

Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

2003-11-25 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 13:25, David O'Brien wrote: On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:07:55PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: What about the newer version of gcc? That is considerably slower than previous versions, but I don't see people screaming to have it removed. Uh... you must not know

Re: NSS and PAM, dynamic vs. static (was: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh)

2003-11-25 Thread Matthias Andree
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, David O'Brien wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:00:08AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: As a user, I like /rescue better than the step-child that /stand/* used to be. It's part of the world, which /stand wasn't. Except that we still have /stand. It should be shot, but

[ATAng?] ad1 disappeared again

2003-11-25 Thread NAKAJI Hiroyuki
Hi, I'm preparing new machine with 5-current. First, I installed a snapshot on Feb 21 2003. It works well. From the beginning of this week, I started updating it to the latest, and found the problem. The box is built with following parts. o ASUS P4G8X o P4 2.53GHz o 2GB memory o Seagate

Re: How to fix this in 5.1-REL??

2003-11-25 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : ...Because changes are applied that will allow smooth upgrades : when the kernel is built after the new system is built, but before it is : installed, make world is increasingly unlikely to work... : : The recent statfs

Re: Modem(PCMCIA) works on 4.8, hangs machine on 5.2-BETA

2003-11-25 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : sio2 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 11 flags 0x4 slot 0 on pccard0 : sio2: type 16550A : sio2: unable to activate interrupt in fast mode - using normal mode : The SIO2 is my Toshiba 3CXM056-BNW modem, and is what I'm

Re: How to fix this in 5.1-REL??

2003-11-25 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 06:51:15PM -0800, walt wrote: Brooks Davis answered: walt asked: What does 'buildworld' give us that the new kernel might need? The correct toolchain including the compiler and config(8). Okay, thanks, that helps. Just thinking out loud about worst-case

Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

2003-11-25 Thread Michael Edenfield
* boyd, rounin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031125 05:16]: i see that there some doubt about whether running lots of shell scripts ever happens. what happens when you use make? lots of shells get run and they run small (one line?) scripts. Just to provide some real-world numbers, here's what I got

Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

2003-11-25 Thread Michael Edenfield
* M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031125 12:07]: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] boyd, rounin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : i see that there some doubt about whether running lots of : shell scripts ever happens. what happens when you : use make? lots of shells get run and they run

Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

2003-11-25 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Michael Edenfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : * M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031125 12:07]: : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : boyd, rounin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : i see that there some doubt about whether running lots of : :

Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

2003-11-25 Thread Colin Percival
At 00:23 26/11/2003 -0500, Michael Edenfield wrote: Static /bin/sh: real385m29.977s user111m58.508s sys 93m14.450s Dynamic /bin/sh: real455m44.852s user113m17.807s sys 103m16.509s Given that user+sys real in both cases, it looks like you're running out of

Re: How many bikesheds can _you_ build on a pin head ?

2003-11-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. writes: On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: I have for myself recently taken a break from all active FreeBSD development because I find the environment about as pleasant as a kindergarten right before lunch. Does this mean

panic on 5.2 BETA: blockable sleep lock

2003-11-25 Thread Stefan Ehmann
I got the following panic twice when starting xawtv using 5.2 BETA (CVS from Oct 23) panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) sellck @/usr/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:1145 I don't think it is directly related to bktr since the last commit there was ~3 months ago. Here is the dmesg output for

<    1   2